Good luck getting an answer from redhat on this....sheesh

I've asked on afew of their lists afew times.
One time I got no reply from anyone at all, the other time I was told
something about pam but I can't recall what it was (it wasn't from a redhat
employee either)...though it wasn't a fix at all.
All that happened to my system when I tried to force it was.....broken
XFree86  I couldn't even seem to rpm -e everything and put it back in the
installed manor off the distro cd. I ended up reinstalling my complete
system. =(

I'm very disappointed with NOTHING about 4.2 EXCEPT the XFree86 updates.

4.2 roks!


Dan


At 06:52 PM 6/5/1998 -0400, you wrote:
>> From: Erik Troan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Major security holes have been found in the X libraries and xterm, which
>> allow local users access to the root user. All Red Hat 4.x and 5.x systems
>> which X-Windows installed should update their systems. Packages for the
>> SPARC are not yet available. When they are, we will post a separate 
>> announcement so [EMAIL PROTECTED] providing full information on those
>> fixes.
>> 
>> Thanks to the XFree86 group for providing patches for these problems.
>
>RedHat 4.2 with all other errata applied
>
>rpm -Uvh --test XFree86-3.3.2-1.i386.rpm 
>failed dependencies:
>        pam >= 0.59 is needed by XFree86-3.3.2-1
>
>The latest version of pam in the update directory is: pam-0.57-4
>
>Does a new pam rpm need to be made or should we --nodeps it?
>
>Thanks,
>Dave
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
         To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Reply via email to