On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 02:57, Mike Burger wrote: > If he's using the ide-scsi module, it would, without any help, set up both > drives as scd0 and scd1...the cdrw, being the master, would no doubt be > scd0, with the cdrom identified as scd1. > > On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Michael Fratoni wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Wednesday 25 December 2002 03:57 pm, Mike Burger wrote: > > > He's already noted that he's put the CDRW as secondary master, and the > > > CDROM as secondary slave. Those are, by definition, /dev/hdc > > > and/dev/hdd, respectively. > > > > Unless he is using scsi emulation for the CDRW, that changes things. In > > that case, there is no device at /dev/hdc. > > > > I have the same setup, cdrom as secondary slave, CDRW as secondary master. > > > > [mfratoni@paradox mfratoni]$ grep cdrom /etc/fstab > > /dev/cdrom1 /mnt/cdrom1 iso9660 noauto,owner,kudzu,ro,user,unhide 0 0 > > /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom iso9660 noauto,owner,kudzu,ro,user,unhide 0 0 > > > > $ ll /dev/cdrom /dev/cdrom1 > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Jan 1 2002 /dev/cdrom -> /dev/hdd > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Oct 5 00:07 /dev/cdrom1 -> /dev/scd0 > > > > The CDRW is probably accessable as /dev/scd0 > >
Maybe I shouldve been more clear, that was the reason I asked for the dmesg output. Sorry, but it was Xmas day and i had been "getting into the spirit" :) I have a CD and and a CD-RW in my own machine here and the CDRW appears as scd0. If this is the case then the mount coammand will fail -- Alan & Jan Harding Tel: 07715 539272 "One by one the penguins are stealing my sanity" -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
