On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 06:40:37PM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:34:18PM -0500, fred smith wrote:
> > Guys:
> >
> > I've got a 6.2 box at work (can't update yet because it's used for
> > development and customers run the result on 6.2).
>
> If this system is unprotected on the Internet than it's likely been
> hacked. You haven't given us much else for info to go on...
No it's not unprotected, it's inside the corporate firewall.
>
> I'm not being snotty saying it's been hacked - it's a fact of life these
> days. Stock 6.2 is not secure by any stretch of the imagination. There
> are holes in ftp, ssl, and a bunch of other places.
Yes, I know. But this seems to have occurred most likely because fsck went
wild fixing up a munged filesystem.
--
---- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------ ----
Do you not know? Have you not heard?
The LORD is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth.
He will not grow tired or weary, and his understanding no one can fathom.
----------------------------- Isaiah 40:28 (niv) -----------------------------
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
