[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Offtopic question (Rudolf) 2. RE: How to run X over SSH? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 3. RE: touch modifies read-only files ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 4. RE: Help Setting Up BIND on Redhat. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 5. Autologin on redhat edition ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 6. Re: Autologin on redhat edition (Ashley Kitson) 7. RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature? (Burke, Thomas G.) 8. ADSL with Earthlink over Covad using PPPoE (Burke, Thomas G.) 9. Re: Autologin on redhat edition (Duncan Hill) 10. RE: Redhat file server using W2K user id's (Turner, John) 11. Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature? (Sander Steffann) 12. RE: Compile modules for Apache V2 (Turner, John) 13. RE: ADSL with Earthlink over Covad using PPPoE (Ferguson, Michael) --__--__-- Message: 1 From: "Rudolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Offtopic question Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 03:53:39 -0500 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Many Thanks to All. I will inform you in case of this project starts, and hope you will also participate in it. Regards Rudolf ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 5:30 PM Subject: Re: Offtopic questionCouldn't you have just sent this link: http://www.centile.com/briefs/Enterprise-ipbx-product-brief.pdf That attachment went to several thousand people, most of whom had no interest in it, and some of whom have metered Internet access. -----Original Message----- From: Terry Broadbent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, January 24, 2003 17:19 Subject: RE: Offtopic questionI sell a VOIP product that will do exactly what you need. Attached is the product information.[snip] -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list--__--__-- Message: 2 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: How to run X over SSH? Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 19:34:33 +1000 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Leo Huang <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thursday, 30 January 2003 17:46:From Cameron's response, It seems I have to installsomething on my local machines?? LeoLeo, I think you should describe what X programs you want to run and why you need to tunnel the X. Perhaps there are other ways of doing it. for example VNC might be suitable. If you have a slow connection somewhere in between your client and server then it won't be a very pleasant experience, although X will generally be faster than VNC. If you are going to go the trouble of installing cygwin to get the XFree-86 server then you might find you can get some of the X applications to run directly on the PC (possibly still as X clients). You could try the demo version of X-Win32 from www.starnet.com. Cameron. --__--__-- Message: 3 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: touch modifies read-only files Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:24:10 +1000 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] nate <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thursday, 30 January 2003 18:46:Dan Bar Dov said:If the file is owned by the user, touch will modify its last-mod-time. This is contrary to my understanding that a read only file cannot be modified (unless I insist as in rm -f) Is this standard on all Unixes?[snip]... I am not sure if this is standard, but you shouldn't rely on this sort of test with touch. I don't feel like powering up my solaris machines but my FreeBSD 4.7 system shows the same behavior. My RS/6000 and SGI Indy aren't plugged in either. nateSame on Solaris. If you think about it, the times are in the inode, not the file. Blocking write permissions to a file cannot also block write permission to the inode, because that is where the permissions are stored - but you don't have general access to the inodes anyway. Whether the file is actually writable or not, touch is still just lying about it being modified. It does not actually modify it. I then started trying to remember how touch works - the system call it uses is utime(2), so you can read the man page on the defined permissions for modification. I tried on the Solaris man page but it left me too confused to repeat here. I think they meant it is ok if you are effectively root, or the owner, or have write permission. Different permissions might apply if you are trying to set another time in the past or the future. I presume there's a Posix standard for it. Somewhere. Cameron. --__--__-- Message: 4 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Help Setting Up BIND on Redhat. Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:44:46 +1000 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tasha Smith <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thursday, 30 January 2003 19:10:Hiii, Im trying to set-up BIND on my LAN. I have one Redhat machine acting as a <Firewall, Router, DNS Server> and 2 WINDOWS machines behind it. Right now the windows machines are configured to have my ISP DNS as there Primary DNS server but i want my Linux machine to act as the DNS server. #####Redhat 7.3 (2.4.20), Bind-9.2.2rc1####### Soo i think i want to set-up a forwarding name server. Soo this is what i got soo far: i created the file called /etc/named.conf and in it is: options { directory "/var/named"; forwarders { <IP address of forwarder>; }; forward only; }; I ran named-checkconf and no errors. I have also created a /var/named <---directory! Now im confused on the next steps i need after this can someone help....And do i need more stuff in my /etc/named.conf file? Thanks guysI also have in named.conf: listen-on { 127.0.0.1; 192.168.0.1; -- address of internal lan eth i/f }; to make sure it ignores the outside world (and my mistakes are less likely to escape). Not sure about the rest, because I created a bogus internal domain and populated it with my home PCs IP addresses. Which seemed like a fun thing at the time (did I say that?) but in the end was a bit overkill. The kids know the IP numbers of all the machines anyway. The DNS howto (www.tldp.org) I think was what I mainly followed. Cameron. --__--__-- Message: 5 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Autologin on redhat edition Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:22:34 +0100 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi everyone, I have a computer with Redhat 8.0 and just one user. I would like to start automatically a session X without entering the user's name and password. Does someone know how to do that? Thanks Thierry --__--__-- Message: 6 From: "Ashley Kitson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Autologin on redhat edition Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:32:59 -0000 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thierry edit the /etc/initab file (as root) and change the id:3:initdefault: line to read id:5:initdefault: Prior to this you will see a reminder of the different runlevel settings. I assume 5 is X11 on yours. However you may want to lay off doing this until you are totally sure that you have your system bedded down as if you get a hang in X11 then you may not be able to fix it in text mode without a re-install (I'm a newby and it happened to me!!) Kind Regards Mr Ashley Kitson www.bbcb.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:22 PM Subject: Autologin on redhat editionHi everyone, I have a computer with Redhat 8.0 and just one user. I would like to start automatically a session X without entering the user's name and password. Does someone know how to do that? Thanks Thierry -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list--__--__-- Message: 7 From: "Burke, Thomas G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature? Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 04:45:32 -0800 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2C85D.7A35B8D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Be sure to change the osirusoft.com entry. It is incorrect, and will cause everything sent to your machine to be rejected. This is stated on their website. I think is should be osirusoft.net, but I wouldn't swear to it. - -----Original Message----- From: Toto Gamez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Sendmail anti-spam feature? I tried to activate the sendmail anti spam. My sendamil.mc is at /etc/mail and my senmail.cf file is at /etc. whn i issued "m4 /etc/sendmail.mc > /etc/sendmail.cf" i got an error "m4: /etc/sendmail.mc: No such file or directory". I chang my command to "m4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > /etc/sendmail.cf" but I also got this error message "/etc/mail/sendmail.mc:11: m4: Cannot open /usr/lib/sendmail-cf/m4/cf.m4: No such file or directory" What should I do next? I just added this to my sendmail.mc file: FEATURE(`dnsbl',`relays.osirusoft.com')dnl FEATURE(`dnsbl',`relays.ordb.org')dnl FEATURE(`dnsbl',`list.dsbl.org')dnl FEATURE(`dnsbl',`dnsbl.sorbs.net')dnl Do I also have to include this?: FEATURE(`delay_check')dnl Please help Regards, Toto -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3 iQA/AwUBPjkePtPjBkUEZx5AEQIJhwCcDIpZo0JKR/oYY2UNAFQ1mPAmZ24AoMHX LNp9uMrlubMtv3MxzyZ8pdUo =jnBC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2C85D.7A35B8D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12"> <TITLE>RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <P><FONT SIZE=2>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>Hash: SHA1</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=2>Be sure to change the osirusoft.com entry. It is incorrect, and will</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>cause everything sent to your machine to be rejected. This is stated</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>on their website. I think is should be osirusoft.net, but I wouldn't</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>swear to it.</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=2>- -----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Toto Gamez [<A HREF="" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="">"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>]</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:07 PM</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: Sendmail anti-spam feature?</FONT> </P> <BR> <P><FONT SIZE=2>I tried to activate the sendmail anti spam. My sendamil.mc is at</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>/etc/mail and my senmail.cf file is at /etc. whn i issued "m4</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>/etc/sendmail.mc > /etc/sendmail.cf" i got an error "m4:</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>/etc/sendmail.mc: No such file or directory". I chang my command to</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>"m4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > /etc/sendmail.cf" but I also got this</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>error message "/etc/mail/sendmail.mc:11: m4: Cannot open</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>/usr/lib/sendmail-cf/m4/cf.m4: No such file or directory" What should</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>I do next?</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>I just added this to my sendmail.mc file:</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>FEATURE(`dnsbl',`relays.osirusoft.com')dnl</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>FEATURE(`dnsbl',`relays.ordb.org')dnl</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>FEATURE(`dnsbl',`list.dsbl.org')dnl</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>FEATURE(`dnsbl',`dnsbl.sorbs.net')dnl</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=2>Do I also have to include this?:</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>FEATURE(`delay_check')dnl</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>Please help</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>Regards,</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>Toto</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT> </P> <BR> <P><FONT SIZE=2>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=2>iQA/AwUBPjkePtPjBkUEZx5AEQIJhwCcDIpZo0JKR/oYY2UNAFQ1mPAmZ24AoMHX</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>LNp9uMrlubMtv3MxzyZ8pdUo</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>=jnBC</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</FONT> </P> </BODY> </HTML> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2C85D.7A35B8D0-- --__--__-- Message: 8 From: "Burke, Thomas G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ADSL with Earthlink over Covad using PPPoE Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 05:05:00 -0800 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey gang, We discussed this some in the recent past, but they are switching my service over today, so I have some questions. I'm using a Telocity (now DirecTV, soon to be nobody) ADSL "modem", and have opted to try to make it work with their system, rather than spending the $26 to get their modem shipped to me (what can I say, I'm cheap)... I've already downloaded roaring penguin, & it is ready for installation. 1) I have a static IP, but do not know what it is. 2) I am currently configured for DHCP ethx configuration 1st question - has anyone else made this swithc? What I'm getting at is this -"did Telocity/DirecTV use PPPoE & their modem handled it, so I should just need to reset the modem & maybe it will work?" 2nd question - if the 1st quenstions' answer is "no," what are the steps I need to do to setup roaring penguin - yes, I know, RTFM, but I'm looking for some insight, here.... I think the big problem I have is going to be setting up my IP address when I don't even know it. I understand that the modem that Earthlink would ship me handles the PPPoE conversion itself & uses DHCP for my machines connection to it - Is this true? - THey call their modem a Bridged Ethernet ADSL Modem (I think it's a two-wire job). 3rd question - what changes do I need to make to my startup scripts (esp. for my ethernet *e.g. ifup, etc.*), to get the whole mess to work? Thanks, Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3 iQA/AwUBPjkizdPjBkUEZx5AEQKsDgCdG/PV9kTp2aIybczLAmaSP5bFRCAAn0Gy 7o1ZsxxXC+TVMj9nv8e7pTKf =bAnL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --__--__-- Message: 9 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:07:02 +0000 From: Duncan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Autologin on redhat edition Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi everyone, I have a computer with Redhat 8.0 and just one user. I would like to start automatically a session X without entering the user's name and password. Does someone know how to do that?Autologin in X is controlled by the [G|K|X]DM program. GDM (the Gnome login handler) and I think KDM (KDE version) both allow you to pick a user as the default user to login automatically as. --__--__-- Message: 10 From: "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Redhat file server using W2K user id's Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 08:14:51 -0500 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.samba.org John-----Original Message----- From: DuSTiN KRySaK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:51 AM To: Redhat Mailing List Subject: Redhat file server using W2K user id's Hi there... I have a win2000 network, and want to start to get away from that... And I need a simple file server, and I was hoping to have it run RH8... Now - I was wondering.. Was it possible to share out a folder on the RH box, but use the user id's from my (w2K) Active Directory? I do not want to have to maintain 2 sets of user id's.... Dustin -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list--__--__-- Message: 11 From: "Sander Steffann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature? Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:19:25 +0100 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?Hi,Be sure to change the osirusoft.com entry. It is incorrect, and will cause everything sent to your machine to be rejected. This is stated on their website. I think is should be osirusoft.net, but I wouldn't swear to it.I don't know where you heard this, but relays.osirusoft.com is the official name for the Osirusoft blacklists... Sander. --__--__-- Message: 12 From: "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Compile modules for Apache V2 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 08:20:36 -0500 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've never used "--with-layout=RedHat", so I don't know exactly what that does. Typically, configure takes an argument like "--with-prefix=/SOME/DIR" where /SOME/DIR is where you want files to go, like /usr/local/apache. You might want to run find and check to see if there are multiple httpd files on your drive: find / -name httpd -print If there are others besides /usr/bin/httpd, run them with -V to see if any of them are .44...that will help you start to track down where your files went. You can also run find with a time option to find all the files created/modified within the last 24 hours, which would help you track down all of the files that are new in your root directory. Be careful deleting files from /, though. John-----Original Message----- From: DuSTiN KRySaK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:25 AM To: Redhat Mailing List Subject: Re: Compile modules for Apache V2 Ok, so I tried compiling Apache this evening, and I never got any errors, BUT.... It seems as though it has installed into the root of the drive, There are all these files there now like... "httpd.conf" and "httpd-2.0.40-pod.patch", etc etc.... And at the command line when I run /usr/bin/httpd -V it still shows as being V 2.0.40 instead of V 2.0.44... What I ran for commands to create the package were... ./configure --enable-module=so --enable-ssl --with-layout=RedHat I was hoping this wopuld compile and install over my previous version of Apache... Then I ran: make then: make install Can anyone see where I went wrong? I am just trying to upgrade my Apach install from 2.0.40 to 2.0.44 with all the same options and modules in the same location.... And to have the GUI work too. Thanks in advance! Dustin On 1/28/03 11:22 PM, "DuSTiN KRySaK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spit this out onto my computer screen:Hi there, I need to compile Apache again so that I can hopefully get coldfusion mx to work with my version of redhat (V8)... Atany rate, I ampretty new to Linux, and I was wondering which Apachemodules I shouldinclude when I compile apache? I know it all depends onwhat I want myserver to be able to do... I just want to know what isconsidered "thenorm".-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list--__--__-- Message: 13 From: "Ferguson, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: ADSL with Earthlink over Covad using PPPoE Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 08:30:21 -0500 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telocity gave the modem 1 IP address 216.222.176.234 and the Computer another 216.222.176.233 You might first have to configure the telocity modem http://10.5.2.1 or something like that. That's all I can remember. I switched to Comcast cable(fiber) and it is blaaaazing fast. -----Original Message----- From: Burke, Thomas G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:05 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: ADSL with Earthlink over Covad using PPPoE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey gang, We discussed this some in the recent past, but they are switching my service over today, so I have some questions. I'm using a Telocity (now DirecTV, soon to be nobody) ADSL "modem", and have opted to try to make it work with their system, rather than spending the $26 to get their modem shipped to me (what can I say, I'm cheap)... I've already downloaded roaring penguin, & it is ready for installation. 1) I have a static IP, but do not know what it is. 2) I am currently configured for DHCP ethx configuration 1st question - has anyone else made this swithc? What I'm getting at is this -"did Telocity/DirecTV use PPPoE & their modem handled it, so I should just need to reset the modem & maybe it will work?" 2nd question - if the 1st quenstions' answer is "no," what are the steps I need to do to setup roaring penguin - yes, I know, RTFM, but I'm looking for some insight, here.... I think the big problem I have is going to be setting up my IP address when I don't even know it. I understand that the modem that Earthlink would ship me handles the PPPoE conversion itself & uses DHCP for my machines connection to it - Is this true? - THey call their modem a Bridged Ethernet ADSL Modem (I think it's a two-wire job). 3rd question - what changes do I need to make to my startup scripts (esp. for my ethernet *e.g. ifup, etc.*), to get the whole mess to work? Thanks, Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3 iQA/AwUBPjkizdPjBkUEZx5AEQKsDgCdG/PV9kTp2aIybczLAmaSP5bFRCAAn0Gy 7o1ZsxxXC+TVMj9nv8e7pTKf =bAnL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-install-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list To Unsubscribe Go To ABOVE URL or send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: unsubscribe --__--__-- __ redhat-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list End of redhat-list Digest
