> Yes. And reply packets are not covered at all by > that rule. And > without knowing the complete set of rules, one > cannot comment on > this single rule anyway.
Actually, since my insert was to position 1 and my target was ACCEPT, how could other input rules have any affect? Or am I confused again? > The output of ipchains-save > would be the > least I would like to see. I hadn't even heard of ipchains-save until now. Thanks for the information. >Btw, opening all > priviledged ports when > in fact you want *just* active/passive FTP (ports > ftp and ftp-data) > is a strange approach, too. > It's a 'just make it work approcah' :) Thanks for the input -exits > - -- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+PbSX0iMVcrivHFQRArf+AJ4gNnJnnsG6J7QTlC5q3pxKJyQlBACfQMfo > ZVsQMIYaaaZsK8bXzQ9TVls= > =z/ID > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
