With my setup, I have my RH box acting as domain controller for my W2KSo, how do I remove the plain password registry modification from win 2000. I am not very familiar with regedit other than to know it exists :)
machines. You will need to ditch the cleartext passwords for this to
work (you shouldn't need cleartext passwords anyways).
Jim
If you do it this way, you can have login scripts, roaming profiles,-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
etc. You won't need a password to connect to shares because your
login password will be used. Very handy and isn't that much effort
to setup.
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Vellenga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 3:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Samba and win 2000
Greetings everyone,
I have been running my home network using RH8 as the internet
gateway/firewall and server for the other win boxes that are connected. Up
until recently all the windows boxes I have been using have been windows
98, but due to upgrading of the video editing software on my video editing
machine I needed to go to win 2000. I installed the plain password reg
file, so I can connect to the various shares, but what I would like to do
it have the machine automatically log on to the various shares so I don't
have to type in the user name and password the first time I access a shared
volume. Is there are way to do this? I would appreciate some direction
toward helpful walk through or how to's.
Jim
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
--__--__--
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 16:19:02 -0500
From: "Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Americal Division Veterans Association <http://www.americal.org/>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Apology to those affected:
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J. M. Brenner wrote:
> Think about it: automated mail, sent out based on a keyword
> match in a public mailing list, with reply address broken.
> Are you getting to the word "spam" yet?
The broken reply address is a problem.
I think something like this should be implemented on the server, so that
the message never makes it to the list. Absent that, I don't see any harm
in *well designed* client side implementations by one or more list members.
Tony
--
Anthony E. Greene <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Chat: TonyG05 HomePage: <http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/>
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation. <http://www.linux.org/>
--__--__--
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 22:26:08 +0100
From: Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: libmysqlclient.so.10
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:05:27 -0800, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> So, how should I go about it? Install mysql with --nodeps or
> perl-DBD-MySQL with --nodeps and then the other?
Without --nodeps and both packages _at once_. *That* solves
circular dependencies.
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+Vplw0iMVcrivHFQRAiPNAJ48kTZokYXCAxpfGqiE/CXTjv6c0ACdF9v2
uLCy+O8MWecCZaungv0sWi4=
=XqWU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--__--__--
Message: 11
From: "Terry Hobart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: RH7.2 lokkit changes don't hold
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:31:21 -0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0087_01C2D9AD.85859910
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>From the messages you have given so far I think maybe something else may be
in effect. You can check the iptables script lokkit created to make sure
things are set the way you expected them to be. I’ll warn you though, I don’
t use lokkit because of things like your message. So, take my location
information with a grain of salt. The file should be in /etc/sysconfig and
be titled iptables (I use 8.0 7.2 was on the edge of the ipchains to
iptables switch over) or ipchains.
One thing you might do is service iptables (or ipchains) stop and then check
again. This will eliminate the firewall from the problem so you can check
the card setup.
My boss swears by shorewall as a fire wall tool. Check it out too. I am
partial to guard dog ( I am new to linux and it is designed as a learning
tool).
As for your direct lokkit question yes. Each time lokkit is invoked it
says high no matter what the existing fire wall is doing. It writes the
changes when you save to be invoked the next time the iptables/ipchains
damon is restarted.
Hope this helps and I am not leading you too far astray.
Terry
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Douglas, Stuart
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RH7.2 lokkit changes don't hold
Hmmm...you may have lost me here, Terry.
It sounds like what you're saying is that even though lokkit is displaying
high, it actually has been setup with my changes? That would be great but I
think it actually IS on high in that I ping it at it's now address but can
neither connect via ftp nor ssh. Do I need to stop/start the service after
making changes? Is there some place I can look to see what the actual live
settings are?
Thx!
Stuart
-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Hobart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RH7.2 lokkit changes don't hold
Lokkit reverts to high by default each time it is invoked. The original
settings are in effect on the machine it is just that when lokkit runs it
does not read them and just displays high. The obvious problem with this is
you have to remember what you entered the last time in order to do it again.
Terry
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Douglas, Stuart
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Com (E-mail)
Subject: RH7.2 lokkit changes don't hold
After assigning a new IP to an ftp server, I find that the firewall is
reverting to a high setting and won't stay at medium with allowances for ssh
and ftp. Any ideas on why or how to make it stick?
Thanks!
Stuart
------=_NextPart_000_0087_01C2D9AD.85859910
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
From the messages you have given so far I think maybe something = else may be in effect. You can check the iptables script lokkit created to make = sure things are set the way you expected them to be. I ll warn you though, I = don t use lokkit because of things like your message. So, take my location = information with a grain of salt. The file should be in /etc/sysconfig and be titled iptables (I use 8.0 7.2 was on the edge of the ipchains to = iptables switch over) or ipchains.
One thing you might do is service iptables (or ipchains) stop and = then check again. This will eliminate the firewall from the problem so you = can check the card setup.
My boss swears by shorewall as a fire wall tool. Check it out = too. I am partial to guard dog ( I am new to linux and it is designed as a = learning tool).
As for your direct lokkit question yes. Each time lokkit = is invoked it says high no matter what the existing fire wall is doing. It writes the = changes when you save to be invoked the next time the iptables/ipchains damon is restarted.
Hope this helps and I am not leading you too far astray. =
Terry
<= span class=3DEmailStyle21>
-----Original Message-----
From: = [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Douglas, Stuart
Sent: Friday, February = 21, 2003 11:43 AM
To: = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RH7.2 lokkit = changes don't hold
Hmmm...you may = have lost me here, Terry.
<= /p>
It sounds like = what you're saying is that even though lokkit is displaying high, it actually = has been setup with my changes? That would be great but I think it = actually IS on high in that I ping it at it's now address but can neither connect = via ftp nor ssh. Do I need to stop/start the service after making changes? Is there some place I can look to see what the actual = live settings are?
<= /p>
Thx!<= /p>
<= /p>
Stuart<= /p>
-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Hobart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February = 21, 2003 2:30 PM
To: = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RH7.2 lokkit = changes don't hold
Lokkit = reverts to high by default each time it is invoked. The original settings are in = effect on the machine it is just that when lokkit runs it does not read them = and just displays high. The obvious problem with this is you have to remember = what you entered the last time in order to do it = again.
Terry<= /p>
-----Original Message-----
From: = [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Douglas, Stuart
Sent: Friday, February = 21, 2003 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Com (E-mail)
Subject: RH7.2 lokkit = changes don't hold
<= /p>
After assigning = a new IP to an ftp server, I find that the firewall is reverting to a high = setting and won't stay at medium with allowances for ssh and ftp. Any ideas on = why or how to make it stick?
Thanks! <= /p>
Stuart <= /p>
------=_NextPart_000_0087_01C2D9AD.85859910--
--__--__--
__
redhat-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
End of redhat-list Digest
