On Sat, 31 May 2003, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > Matthew Saltzman wrote: > >> > >>To install gcc++ and libstdc++ requires 82 packages be removed (I use > >>RedCarpet for all my updates, since I can get Gnome updates as well as > >>general RedHat updates) > > > > > > I think he meant to suggest getting the latest gcc *source* (not as an > > RPM), compile that and install it outside of the RPM system. Then you'll > > have two compilers. > > Ah. Well, I have the other gcc compilers installed no problem (gccjava, > g77, gnat, etc)
Sure. Those are "add-ons" to gcc, and they are all the same version. If you want to change the gcc *version*, you're going to have to change all those others too, plus some libraries (libstdc++ in particular) and any programs linked to those libraries. You can have different *versions* of gcc on the same system, but you have to be careful about conflicts. > > > > > The other possibility is that there were gcc-3.1 RPMs for RH7.3 that were > > designed to play nicely with the gcc-2.96 ones that came with it. Maybe > > someone remembers where to find them. > > > > I was pulling all my RPM's directly from ftp.redhat.com/pub/path/to/9.0/rpms Maybe my memory is failing me, but I thought you started with a 7.x system and wanted a gcc-3.2 compiler on it. Your alternatives are: (1) Upgrade to RH9 (as we were discussing in the other thread). (2) Install gcc-3.2 and libraries in /usr/local (from source, without using RPM). (3) Find the gcc-3.1 RPMs that were meant for installation on RH7.x. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list