On Sat, 31 May 2003, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:

> Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> >>
> >>To install gcc++ and libstdc++ requires 82 packages be removed (I use
> >>RedCarpet for all my updates, since I can get Gnome updates as well as
> >>general RedHat updates)
> >
> >
> > I think he meant to suggest getting the latest gcc *source* (not as an
> > RPM), compile that and install it outside of the RPM system.  Then you'll
> > have two compilers.
>
> Ah. Well, I have the other gcc compilers installed no problem (gccjava,
> g77, gnat, etc)

Sure.  Those are "add-ons" to gcc, and they are all the same version.  If
you want to change the gcc *version*, you're going to have to change all
those others too, plus some libraries (libstdc++ in particular) and any
programs linked to those libraries.  You can have different *versions* of
gcc on the same system, but you have to be careful about conflicts.

>
> >
> > The other possibility is that there were gcc-3.1 RPMs for RH7.3 that were
> > designed to play nicely with the gcc-2.96 ones that came with it.  Maybe
> > someone remembers where to find them.
> >
>
> I was pulling all my RPM's directly from ftp.redhat.com/pub/path/to/9.0/rpms

Maybe my memory is failing me, but I thought you started with a 7.x system
and wanted a gcc-3.2 compiler on it.  Your alternatives are:

(1) Upgrade to RH9 (as we were discussing in the other thread).
(2) Install gcc-3.2 and libraries in /usr/local (from source, without
    using RPM).
(3) Find the gcc-3.1 RPMs that were meant for installation on RH7.x.

-- 
                Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to