On 16 Jun 2003 at 15:47, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 07:02, Scarletdown wrote: > > > > Here's links to a couple pictures of the screen, > > showing what I mean here... > > <WHACK> > ????? That just a synonym for <SNIP>? :p > KDE is graphics intensive; eye-candy intensive. Even on high-end > graphics cards, it's intensive. > > In all honesty, either switch to a less intensive window manager and > desktop (like Blackbox, Fluxbox or XFCE) or get a better video card > and the driver to suit. The problem _is_ proving to only very intermittent afterall. KDE does seem to be working fine for the most part, and surprisingly fast on this system (only a Pentium- 120). Other window managers gave me the same graphics glitches, which were fixed by "refreshing" the screen. I will go ahead and stay with KDE for now, since it seems to be operating fine now; though I am keeping AfterStep on the system as well just in case. I've uninstalled all other Window managers in order to free up some drive space. After a little more tweaking (testing various packages, and uninstalling ones I don't need), I will be putting in a 2MB video card (S3 Vision968 - PCI) and disabling the on-board video. This system is even lower on the hand-me-down upgrades chain than the other experimental system I'm tinkering with, so it will be a while before he gets a 4MB or better video card. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list