-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 10:08:06 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > > ftp://[ftp.nluug.nl/site/]ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/ > > > 2. 1AS/en/os/SRPMS/kernel-2.4.18-e.31.src.rpm . > > > > Erhm, no, no, no! That is for Itanium again, see here: > > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-145.html > > That advisory is for both Enterprise AS 2.1 as well as Advanced Workstation > 2.1 for Itanium. Itanium, Itanium. How do you explain the more recent RHSA-2003:195-06 from 2003-06-19, which ships kernel 2.4.9-e.25 for ix86 platforms? > I am not entirely sure about the reasoning behind the fact > that only source RPMS are provided for i386 (I can understand this to be the > case on a public mirror, after all Enterprise is Red Hat's cash cow). Maybe > because it's an extra feature for AS 2.1. Because you get binary packages via RHEN only. > Get the src rpm, doing > rpm --rebuild kernel-2.4.18-e.31.src.rpm I don't care at all whether you can create rpms for ix86 from a src.rpm where Red Hat includes conditional build code for ix86. All that matters to me is what the official and supported erratum is. - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+/xs/0iMVcrivHFQRAjAPAJ9NSRUbjnmujqqHZWBYoOLzXaI2fwCdFFjA hArcTsPvimzEqaWgH2JO2SQ= =ibkD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
