On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 14:06, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote: > > > To me, one of my arguments is that you don't *have* to upgrade your > hardware > > until it physically gives up the ghost. It's M$ that makes you have to > > upgrade hardware, every time you get a new release. Especially in the > > middle of the most major recessino since the Depression, when > companies are > > running tight, and home users are strapped for cash, most can't afford > to > > buy new hardware. > > The major difference here is, M$ refuses to support anything over three > releases old. That means no service packs, no security fixes, nothing. > They pretty much force you to upgrade. > > Redhat, on the other hand, does not do that. You can still get patches > and updates for older OS's. > > Ben
Agreed that Red Hat community does a much better job with support, but this states that Red Hat doesn't support RH 7 and older. http://www.redhat.com/support/resources/archive.html Vince -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
