On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:09:55AM -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > As you've correctly pointed out elsewhere, this is part of the > backup _strategy_ whereas the argument is about _media_. I did point > out initially that time travel is important in a backup strategy and > suggested a way to do it.
Ah, yes you did, indeed. I had missed that that excellent post was by you. (A reaction to it: Most instances of people saying "to be secure, uninstall everything, make the box unusable" make me scoff, but your description of a very limited backup box is actually appropriate to the use. Bravo.) I will note, however, that I wasn't the only one to fall for your isolated "disks make great raid installations!"-post. A tape defender will tout removability and portability, good to head off at the pass both them and the likes of me. So, sorry to criticize, but had I checked back more carefully in the thread I would still have posted a response clarifying that you do know the difference between backup and a raid array. -kb, the Kent who thinks the idea of incremental backups over the internet is about to be the new version of "off site backup". -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
