I'm finding a bit more, but still am at a loss. It seems that ld is
either also upgraded during my mess session. (this has been a few weeks
ago and I forgot exactly what all I did) This was when I upgraded to
glibc 2.3 i386 instead of glibc 2.3 i686 and have since gone back to
glibc 2.2 i686 and have been a bit gun shy to mess around with glibc for
the time being. Seems a LOT of people did this same thing, most doing a
complete reinstall. Boo RedHat for allowing this without even a warning.
Running ld -V returns
ld: /lib/i686/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found (required by ld)
So, to me it looks like I have the wrong version of whatever rpm ld
comes with. Any ideas?
John Hinton
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
