On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:40:20 -0500, Ed Wilts wrote
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 08:31:41PM -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> > I am trying to plan for what action will need to be done due to the
> > demise of RHL. Some have suggested that Fedora will be a logical
> > replacement. Others have said that yum/apt might be used in place of
> > up2date. Still others have suggested that redhat network will be
> > migrated to Fedora.
> 
> up2date supports Fedora today. RHN will not be "migrated to Fedora" -
> that statement doesn't make sense.  RHN will support multiple releases.
> It supports releases at least as far back as 6.2 today, even though 
> no new security updates have been issued since the end of March (and 
> there are issues with the latest certificates on 6.2).  Still, today,
>  RHN suports at least 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 8.0, 9, Fedora, AS2.1, and Taroon.
> Multiply that by the large number of architectures also supported for
> AS2.1 and Taroon, and you've got quite a few combinations.

Thank you, my mistake. I had been paid subscriber to RHN for a long time and
did not realize it supported other than RH releases.

> > I need a stable 12-18 month release supported by something like
> > up2date. It use will not be in a production environment, but it is not
> > intended to be bleeding edge either.
> > 
> > Some have suggested that we wait to see what develops. The exchange,
> > however, seemed to imply that waiting might not be a good strategy.
> 
> Waiting is a good strategy.  There will be a release that should address
> your needs.  Be patient.  I do not know when the announcement will be
> forthcoming, and I'm hoping that some details will be released soon
> (like within a week).

Good, thank you. I guess I was a bit tired and overwhelmed by the changes and
how they will impact my activities over the next 18 months. Hit the panic
button a little too soon.

Your comments are consistent with the follow-up message by Jef Spaleta

http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2003-September/msg00388.html

BTW, Jef was a bit miffed about my cross-posting to two other groups about
this issue. It was not my intent to offend anyone, as can be read at 

http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2003-September/msg00396.html

Michael Schwendt also added some insight to the discussion.

http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2003-September/msg00390.html

Thanks to all for your patience.





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to