-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
It does, at least in its main distribution. But RedHat's contrib section,
combined with the rpmfind utility, RH matches it. As for dpkg being better
and more powerful than RPM, I can agree about the power part but its not
as understandable as RPM. Dependencies are a fine example, RPM gives you
two lines, the error, and the problem packages/files. dpkg, on the other
hand, prints a lot of unnecessary chatter, like this:
Error:
emacs_20.4-1.deb:
depends on xlib6g (>= 3.3.5) however:
xlib6g is not installed.
errors were encountered while processing:
emacs_20.4-1.deb
Compare this to RPMS simple message:
ERROR: failed dependencies
emacs-X11-20.4-1 requires XFree86-libs >= 3.3.5
Jacob Schmude
MailTo:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 53401220
Email me for public gpg key.
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Frank Rocco wrote:
> Jeff Graves wrote:
> >
> > three letters...
> >
> > r p m
> >
>
> Why is that better over debian? I heard the dpkg was more powerful.
> I also read that debian has more software.
>
> What is RH return policy if I purchase RH6.1 at my local store?
>
> Regards,
> Frank Rocco
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine
iD8DBQE4epkVGpdY0XMhJGQRAoQTAJ9474YyvYypEeyU7Jis3dL011d8YQCbBK/q
352Bj2mkXvjT1TpePwtx/c4=
=HWDP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
