On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 04:55:36PM -0700, Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
> I think this is an old story : installing NT doesn't screw up the hda
> master boot record but installing any WinXXXX will. Win2000 just shows
> it didn't improve that ...
[...]

But then again, Win2k was supposed to be NT's successor, not Win9x's (to
which the successor is named "Windows ME"[0])

And they're talking about *Linux* fragmenting... :^)

Thomas

[0] obvious pun omitted...
-- 
             "Look, Ma, no obsolete quotes and plain text only!"

     Thomas Ribbrock | http://www.bigfoot.com/~kaytan | ICQ#: 15839919
   "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!"


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.

Reply via email to