On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 04:55:36PM -0700, Philippe Moutarlier wrote: > I think this is an old story : installing NT doesn't screw up the hda > master boot record but installing any WinXXXX will. Win2000 just shows > it didn't improve that ... [...] But then again, Win2k was supposed to be NT's successor, not Win9x's (to which the successor is named "Windows ME"[0]) And they're talking about *Linux* fragmenting... :^) Thomas [0] obvious pun omitted... -- "Look, Ma, no obsolete quotes and plain text only!" Thomas Ribbrock | http://www.bigfoot.com/~kaytan | ICQ#: 15839919 "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!" -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
[OT]Re: Win2000 & Linux w/LILO. Issues?
Thomas Ribbrock \(Design/DEG\) Mon, 20 Mar 2000 01:32:34 -0800
- Win2000 & Linux w/LILO. Issues? Jason Costomiris
- Re: Win2000 & Linux w/LILO. Issue... Eric Cifreo
- Re: Win2000 & Linux w/LILO. I... Jason Costomiris
- Re: Win2000 & Linux w/LILO... Philippe Moutarlier
- RE: Win2000 & Linux w/... Thomas Ribbrock \(Design/DEG\)
- RE: Win2000 & Linux w/LILO. Issue... Juha Saarinen
- RE: Win2000 & Linux w/LILO. Issue... Reimert, Scott
- Re: Win2000 & Linux w/LILO. I... Philippe Moutarlier