I'm not sure this is a Red Hat issue. Is it?
Red had is a packaging agent if you will. They take all the components
that are available on the 'net and just package them.
I just remember back in The Bad Olde Days when SCO did a whole lot of
enhancing to the point where working on a SCO system was fundamentally
different than working on an SVR3 system. Maybe the point that I'm *not*
trying to make was that Interactive went out of business, leaving us with
SCO.
On the whole, if RH wants to develop open source software that does what
you want, I'm happy, but I'm terrified that RH will end up developing
something commercial to provide for your requirements and then stop
supplying the standard sendmail install. Let's also not forget that SCO
switched over MMDF. :-)
--
-Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Stranger things have happened but none stranger than this. Steven W. Orr-
Does your driver's license say Organ Donor?Black holes are where God \
-------divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all individuals!---------
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Brian wrote:
=>On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Toby A. Rider wrote:
=>
=>Yes, these are good for the enterprise and the user alike.
=>
=>One thing I would like to see, which Redhat does not have, is a hashed
=>mail spool. If they aren't going to store messages in maildir format, or
=>some other high load friendly format, then they should imho, hash the
=>mailspool, or allow it to be hashed without having to patch and recompile
=>procmail and the popper.
=>
=>I would also like to see them use cucipop instead of qpopper, since its a
=>perfect match for procmail............
=>
=>A traditional mail spool does not scale well above say 2500 users.
=>
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
