On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Johnnio wrote:

> 
> 
> Brian wrote:
> > 
> > do both nic's show a link light?  how about the hub?
> 
> Brian
> 
> The 1st machine shows a green light on the nic and a steady light on the
> hub
> 
> However the 2nd machine has an old [but I thought functioning NIC] 
> nic which does not have any lights.
> 
> Do you think I should replace the nic on the second machine and 
> test it all again?

possibly.................

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Johnny
> 
> 
>  
> > On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Johnnio wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi again Brian
> > >
> > > This is where I'm at currently...
> > >
> > > I'm now getting 'destination host unreachable'
> > >
> > >
> > > On the 1st box -  RH 5.2  server
> > >
> > > netstat -nr
> > >
> > > 192.168.127.68  0.0.0.0           255.255.255.255 UH 1500 0 0 eth0
> > > 192.168.127.0   0.0.0.0           255.255.255.0   U  1500 0 0 eth0
> > > 127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0           255.0.0.0       U  3584 0 0 lo
> > > 0.0.0.0         192.168.127.68    0.0.0.0         UG 1500 0 0 eth0
> > >
> > > On 2nd box
> > >
> > > netstat -nr
> > >
> > > 192.168.127.65  0.0.0.0           255.255.255.255 UH 1500 0 0 eth0
> > > 192.168.127.0   0.0.0.0           255.255.255.0   U  1500 0 0 eth0
> > > 127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0           255.0.0.0       U  3584 0 0 lo
> > > 0.0.0.0         192.168.127.65    0.0.0.0         UG 1500 0 0 eth0
> > >
> > > Both boxes have each other in their /etc/hosts files
> > >
> > >
> > > Brian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is this what you are saying that I need to see in 'netstat -nr
> > > > > > after ppp connects?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 38.1.1.1        0.0.0.0     255.255.255.255 UH 1500 0 0 eth0
> > > > > > 192.168.127.0   0.0.0.0     255.255.255.0   U  1500 0 0 eth0
> > > > > > 127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0     255.0.0.0       U  3584 0 0 lo
> > > > > > 0.0.0.0         38.1.1.1    0.0.0.0         UG 1500 0 0 ppp0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > the goal is.  Would this be correct?
> > > > >
> > > > > The above routing table looks good.  what does arp -a show? anything?
> > > >
> > > > More than likely what is going on is this:
> > > >
> > > > 1. The machine you are seeing a "timeout" on, has a correct routing table.
> > > > It sends the ping to the destination, but the destination doesn't know how
> > > > to get back to the original source.  Thus a "timeout".
> > > >
> > > > 2. The machine you are seeing nothing on, does not have a correct route to
> > > > the other machine.
> > > >
> > > > Both machines need the 192.168.127.0 route to work properly.  Do a netstat
> > > > -rn on BOTH machines, and post it here if you like..........that is what's
> > > > needed.
> > > >
> > > > Brian
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Johnny
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > > Brian Feeny (BF304)     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 318-222-2638 x 109      http://www.shreve.net/~signal
> > > > Network Administrator   ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
> > > > as the Subject.
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Linux: the operating system with a CLUE...
> > >  [ie...Command Line User Environment]".
> > > (seen in a posting in comp.software.testing)
> > >
> > 
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > Brian Feeny (BF304)     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 318-222-2638 x 109      http://www.shreve.net/~signal
> > Network Administrator   ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
> > as the Subject.
> 
> -- 
> "Linux: the operating system with a CLUE...
>  [ie...Command Line User Environment]".
> (seen in a posting in comp.software.testing)
> 

-----------------------------------------------------
Brian Feeny (BF304)     [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
318-222-2638 x 109      http://www.shreve.net/~signal      
Network Administrator   ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)            


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.

Reply via email to