I would add a couple of Caveats to this (marked below)
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 3:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WinModems Internal vs External
>> Resent-Cc:
>> MBOX-Line: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 7 13:30:22 2000
>> From: "Stephen King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> So let me get this straight most Internal modems are WinModems. Were as
all
>> External modems aren't WinModems?
>> SK
> All of the below are general statements, but probably have exceptions.
> Most fairly new internal modems (especially PCI) are probably
> WinModems.
<CAVEAT ADDED> Almost all PCI modems are Winmodems. All Lucent Technology
modems are Winmodems. Any 56K modem not named Courier or Sportster by USR
is a (true!) WinModem (they have the right's to the name). </CAVEAT>
> Older ISA modems are likely not to be WinModems, but may still be a
> little tricky to get to work with Linux.
<CAVEAT ADDED>Again, look for the Winmodem label on USR products, or
LHT, LT, etc., for others... I have 3 Winmodems in my collection of
modems (about 10 going back over the years), ALL of which are ISA except
for a 300 baud external Accoustic Coupler Modem. </CAVEAT>
> All external serial cable modems are not WinModems (I know of no
> excpetions to this one).
<CAVEAT ADDED> Ditto on the SERIAL external modems... but I've yet to hear
of a USB external modem that isn't a Winmodem of some sort. Also, let's
keep our terms right... a Cable modem is a different beast entirely, and
I've never heard of an External Cable modem that was a Winmodem, either.
Although Internal Cable modems may/may not be </CAVEAT>
Bill Ward
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.