On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Manuel A. Camacho Q. wrote:
> Depends on what you call "old". I am running even 6.2 in a 486 with 24
> MB RAM. And 5.0 & 5.2 will definitely do. No problem with Y2K.
>
OTOH, there are "exploits" known for those versions of
linux, which may or may not have been patched....
John
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality kabir
- Re: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Manuel A. Camacho Q.
- strange log messages John Aldrich
- strange log messages Charles Galpin
- Re: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Mikkel L. Ellertson
- Re: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Bret Hughes
- Re: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Bret Hughes
- Re: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Nitebirdz
- RE: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Ward William E PHDN
- RE: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Bill Carlson
- Re: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Gustav Schaffter
