On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:07:12PM -0400, Kevin Tyle wrote:
> 1. The satellite receiver runs only at 10-Base T. What would
> be the appropriate way to force the 2nd NIC into 10BaseT mode
> without having to use the 3COM DOS diskette? Are there
> some lines in my conf.modules I need to add?
get mii-diags from Donald Becker's web site.
> 2. The satellite machine is factory set to an IP address of
> 192.168.0.1. The documentation says to set the NIC to
> 192.168.0.2, subnet mask 255.255.255.0. Fine, I have done that
> with netcfg, but now I seem to have an "extra" gateway on eth0
> which I don't want:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
> 192.168.0.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth1
> xx.yy.zz.4 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
> **38.248.19.0 router 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0**
> xx.yy.zz.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1
> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
> 0.0.0.0 router 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
>
> This extra gateway on eth0 forces all traffic that should stay within our LAN
> to be routed through our router, which should only handle external traffic.
>
> How can I remove the **'d line from my routing table, either with netcfg or
> via some other means? I tried:
> route del -net xx.yy.zz.0 gw router metric 0 dev eth0
> but I get a "SIOCDELRT: Invalid argument" when I try that.
This question is confusing. Is your office using two networks on one
wire? netcfg is definately confused.
The xx.yy.zz.0 route is necessary because you've defined a host route to
xx.yy.zz.4 over eth0.
route del -net 38.248.19.0 gw router
--
Steve Borho Voice: 314-439-8342
Member of Technical Staff
Celox Networks Inc http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1925.txt
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
