On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
>
> Whether that 'you' was meant for Stephen or 'everyone'. If you are saying
> this is universally true, I am saying that I am an exception to your
> statement, as I have never seen this behavior in 7.0 or previously.
> Other than that, I don't really care. If and when I have problems, I
> will switch clients. Until then it just quietly works for me.
>
Ain't linux wonderful? You've got your choice of clients for this. If
one works, fine... use it. If it doesn't, use the alternative. :-)
John
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Steve Borho
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Steven W. Orr
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Steven W. Orr
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is busted on 7.0 Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is busted on 7.0 Hal Burgiss
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is busted on 7.... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is busted o... Hal Burgiss
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is bus... John Aldrich
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is... Hal Burgiss
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is... John Aldrich
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is bus... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is... Jerry Winegarden
