I'm not done by far, but here's a quick summary for those who gave 
suggestions...

Under Digital Unix the printing to port 9100 works correctly when the 
printcap prints to :lp=@205hp5si/hpnet:\ (where hpnet is 9100 is defined in 
/etc/services).  The only problem here is the built-in accounting only 
accounts correctly for postscript and not PCL.  And the add-on accounting 
script I have doesn't pass PCL jobs correctly.

Under RH Linux 6.2, I added the printer direcly to port through RH 
Printtool, port 9100 is in /etc/services and it references a .config file 
under spool directory for the direct print information (contentsof 
.config:   printer_ip=128.xxx.xxx.xxx, port=9100)
(Printtool shows: printer    DIRECT - Postscript printer at 
128.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100)
and it still doesn't work.
and RH Printtool is used to

So... instead of fighting with a custom way of fooling with it... I'm going 
to try LPRng (www.astart.com) and ifhp.

Worth noting a new book I'm rushing an order on is: 
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/netprint/
And another reference worth noting is (http://www.linuxprinting.org/)

I'm not done, and it will take awhile, so I thought I'd get this much out 
anyway.

Thanks!
--Dan

>Ok... I'm trying to setup print accounting that will work with both 
>postscript from unix and PCL files from samba sending to the same unix 
>queue.  (It appears that accounting that's normally built in usually only 
>works correctly with postscript files, and it has to be directly to the 
>printer port, not remote).
>
>I've been wrestling with this for a year now in my off time in both Dec 
>Unix and RH Linux.
>I'd really appreciate any help so I dont get yelled at anymore.
>
>First step is to get printing working direcly to HP jetdirect port 9100.
>I can telnet to printer:9100 and get a response, but when the printer is 
>setup, jobs aren't printing... either they disappear with no log they went 
>in or out, or they sit in the queue.
>
>I was just trying to see if the "as shipped" lpd would do accounting right 
>for PS & PCL.
>
>Perhaps I should ditch lpd and go straight to using LPRng?
>
>Thanks,
>Dan



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to