Do you use the W2K boot loader or LILO? I've just setup W2K, and haven't been able to get my lilo on another drive to load it. Of course it insisted I remove my SuSE7.0 install before I could install W2K. Thanks, Stew Benedict > it was on this mailing list), regardless of what the red hat > install guide says, win2k appears to be no more trouble to dual boot > than 95 or 98, NTFS or no NTFS. i'm typing this on a dell inspiron > that had three NTFS primary partitions devoted to win2k, and it > installed and dual boots just fine. and others have reported the > same ease of dual booting to win2k. _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- why linux gets such a bad rap ... rpjday
- RE: why linux gets such a bad rap ... Paul Anderson
- RE: why linux gets such a bad rap ... Darryl Harvey
- Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ... Luke C Gavel
- Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ... rpjday
- Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ... Stew Benedict
- Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ... rpjday
- Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ... Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ... David Talkington
- Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ... Luke C Gavel
- Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ... Dave Ihnat
- Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ... Dave Ihnat
- RE: why linux gets such a bad rap ... Darryl Harvey
- RE: why linux gets such a bad rap ... Ward William E PHDN
- RE: why linux gets such a bad rap ... Leonard den Ottolander
- RE: why linux gets such a bad rap ... Mark Basil
