Sorry, Please Ignore my earlier mail.. I was sent it by mistake... This is
not the answer or related discussion under this thread.
Kiran
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Kiran Kumar M wrote:
>
> If you are using more the 2^16 number as a port it will take the
>
> (your_port_number)mod 2^16
>
> So always it will be less than 2^16. This will be applicable with any
> kernel above 2.0.x I believe.
>
> Kiran
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Charles Galpin wrote:
>
> > Sorry Chuck, I don't have an answer for you. I am however fascinated when
> > I hear requests like this. Would you mind sharing what kind of
> > application requires this (I'm guessing a pop/imap server) and what kind
> > of "iron" you use.
> >
> > btw, if it is for a pop/imap server, you can avoid creating accounts for
> > every user with some servers/configurations that use a database instead.
> >
> > thanks
> > charles
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Chuck Carson wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Is it possible under the 2.2.x kernels to support greater than 2^16 UID's?
> > > If so, is it a patch or entirely new kernel we need to look at?
> > >
> > > Thanks greatly,
> > > CC
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
