Strange, it works with ACTIVE transfers quite nicely. Passive transfers are
failing.
Rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tanner, Robby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 5:03 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #1116 - 17 msgs
>
>
> Good idea.
> Thanks.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bob Glover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 3:49 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #1116 - 17 msgs
> >
> >
> > Maybe you should see what rule #13 in the input chain is. From your
> > original message:
> >
> > > Feb 19 17:46:18 weisktsv03 kernel: Packet log: input DENY
> lo PROTO=1
> > * ^^^^^ The
> input chain
> >
> > > 24.68.176.193:3 24.68.176.193:1 L=132 S=0xC0 I=4058
> > F=0x0000 T=255 (#13)
> > * look at
> rule #13
> > ^^^
> >
> > Perhaps your packet never reached the accept rules that you
> > have to the
> > loopback device?
> >
> > It's just a thought.
> >
> > - Bob Glover
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:48:21 -0600 (CST)
> > > From: "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: Re: Curious Log Entries
> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Mikkel, Robby,
> > > >
> > > > > > Feb 19 17:46:18 weisktsv03 kernel: Packet log: input
> > DENY lo PROTO=1
> > > > > > 24.68.176.193:3 24.68.176.193:1 L=132 S=0xC0 I=4058
> > F=0x0000 T=255 (#13)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What could be wrong? Why is 24.68.176.193 trying to
> > connect to itself fro
> > > > > > port 3 to port 1?
> > > > > >
> > > > > Even more interesting, it is talking to itself on the
> > loopback device,
> > > > > not on a NIC... I would check your routing table
> > first, then your
> > > > > firewall rules.
> > > >
> > > > Probably the loopback device is only open for the
> > 127.0.0.0/8 address range.
> > > > I have been wondering before if the loopback device
> > should be opened only for
> > > > this range, or for all addresses. So maybe somebody could
> > tell us something
> > > > about that.
> > > >
> > > > CUO,
> > > >
> > > > Leonard.
> > > >
> > > In my firewall rules, I have the loopback interface open
> > for everything.
> > >
> > > ipchains -A input -i lo -j ACCEPT
> > > ipchains -A output -i lo -j ACCEPT
> > >
> > > Mikkel
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
