[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Send Redhat-list mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Redhat-list digest..." > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: emergence quesion (David Talkington) > 2. Big problem (Ted Hilts) > 3. slightly OT can anyone recommend software converting mp3 to wavs (Neil Hollow) > 4. Re: postfix / procmailrc (Hal Burgiss) > 5. Re: Network Monitoring Software (Lorris J. Woods) > 6. RE: Perl Problem (Steve Sapovits) > 7. RE: Perl - Time Tracking (Steve Howard) > 8. Pentuim 4 an RH6.2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 9. log messages <sc 0(55,c,0)> fill disk (Dan Kirkpatrick) > 10. linuxconf (Peter Peltonen) > 11. Tons of mail incoming suggestion please > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: Re: emergence quesion > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:22:40 -0600 (CST) > From: David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >i use qmail+vpopmail,and i add some rules in /etc/tcp.smtp file,how > >can i let rules effect at once.i mean how to use tcprules > >command,please help me in a hurry > > http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/servers.html#authorized-relay > > - -- > David Talkington > http://www.spotnet.org > > PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/dt000823.asc > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP 6.5.8 > Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 > > iQEVAwUBOreD2b1ZYOtSwT+tAQG0dQgAwPI1IwzZoB83G2MFOalmQGcxleXvueQL > sU9jfNvcG7dGAX0KNBfntF7RBgEcmXopsuI8ZjzZXUhQUEoFuuD26B+MMsNerZfu > qYU/s6nkaAp2DSyVahBtqcfEM0CXkbiuZVTAlZgylJ5ASyP95740Wcg4a1Uhkrsk > OKhIDvuGRQ7ScoyzO3tnse/3LefLtYKS3rfyRuRIho3agAyiVkP7LRltwXEbPJlX > qPoSkFtp/DNKzIGLJ9BG9t0Y2sPGMI2S5XRFdMPsIGEqhVKzW288+XEJoXEl1MDw > l1K0N8MY9+U2kmSqOpcP8bJU/Gd7QlLRYgokb0NcVXEV0h8lqolZ2A== > =D4eA > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: Big problem > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:38:06 -0700 > From: Ted Hilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Organization: MarketShare-PT > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Actually it's a big problem for me and it's probably just a weenie tiny > problem for someone else. That's why I'm asking: > > I have a host web site and performance is always an issue as well as a > professional appearance. One of the outstanding problems with this web > site is a key page that has a full screen picture as the background. We > want it that way. Obviously this takes a short time to load but > significantly longer than the text that shows up almost immediately. > The text is supposed to overlay the picture. Since the picture download > time is greater than the text (which is supposed to overlay the > picture), for a short time, the text appears all by itself against a > flat background color. Ugh!!! The text is organized to look nice when > it overlays the picture. But for about 30 seconds to 1 minute depending > upon network congestion and bandwidth the text is there all by itself > and really looks dumb. > > I need some way of stopping any kind of display until the picture > background has been displayed. Then the text and the other stuff can be > overlaid on the picture. > > Is there any way (and please don't say java unless you can provide an > example) I can tell the server to serve the picture first. It's a > standard web page with table areas and content in the table areas. The > top of the web page has a table area within which the background picture > is displayed with the text overlaid on the background picture. The > remainder of the web page nicely blocks the background (except for > around the edges which is the desired affect). The web page is fairly > long so the background picture gets reproduced twice but only the top > picture is shown - as it is supposed to be. So everything is fine > except that the background picture gets displayed a significantly longer > time after everything else is displayed. Again, Ugh!!! > > One idea which I really don't like, is to create another page just for > the purpose of displaying the background picture so that it is loaded > into the browser cache. Then when the page is sent which is to feature > this picture as the background it will appear much more quickly, > probably as fast as the text. This is of course the case once the page > has been fully downloaded anyway, the browser simply checks for a new > version and if it is not there it takes it from cache. > > So if anyone can help me with what for me is a big unpleasant problem I > would be certainly appreciate the help. And also I won't have to keep > saying Ugh!!! > > Bye-thanks_TED > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: slightly OT can anyone recommend software converting mp3 to wavs > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:34:06 +0000 > From: Neil Hollow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Can anyone recommend software converting mp3 to wavs pref X window point and > click. Ta. NH > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: Re: postfix / procmailrc > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:35:05 -0500 > From: Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: red hat list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > References: <008501c0b158$59341dc0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 10:10:57AM -0600, eric clover wrote: > > hello, > > we went from an old sendmail to postfix recently. with the old sendmail we > > took advantage of the procmailrc and put this in the script : > > 0 > > * ? formail -x"Received:"\ > > | egrep -i "64\.24\." > > /dev/null > > > > with the new postfix this does not work and the amount of spam has become > > unbearable. is there any way to filter this out again so we can go back to > > living with less spam? i do have the line "mailbox_command = > > /usr/bin/procmail" added in the main.cf. > > Have you looked at header_checks and body_checks for filtering spam? > Works very well. I took my most reliable procmail recipes and dumped > them into there. Works fabulously: > > /^Received:.*64\.24/ Reject > > or whatever you are trying to do. > > # Sample regexp lookup "table". > # > # Format is /regexp/flags or /regexp/flags!/regexp/flags > # where regexp is a regular expression as found in regexp(5), and flags are > # i: toggle ignore case (REG_ICASE - default is to ignore case) > # x: toggle extended expression (REG_EXTENDED - default is extended) > # m: toggle multiline mode (REG_NEWLINE - default is non-multiline mode) > # > # In order for a line to match, the first regexp must match, and the > # second (if present) must not match. The first matching line wins, > # terminating processing of the ruleset. > > /^To:.*friend@/ Reject > /^To:.*@.*sdf\.bellsouth\.net/ Reject > /^To: @bellsouth\.net/ Reject > > [...] > > -- > Hal B > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: Re: Network Monitoring Software > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:45:17 -0500 (EST) > From: "Lorris J. Woods" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > David I would like very much to see what you have. > > TIA > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, David Brett wrote: > > > I have looked at these tools and found nothing which fills what I am > > looking for completely. I use combination of applications done by other > > people (i.e. MRTG) and written by my self. If anybody wants to see what I > > have written I will gladly share it. Basicly it is perl script which does > > pings and creates a web page with this information. > > > > > > david > > > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Fernando Lozano wrote: > > > > > Hi Derek! > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am looking for a very robust solution for monitoring activity on a > > > > network. > > > > > > > > - auto-configuration - meaning that it can take a block of IP > > > > addresses and figure out if machines are up, what OS > > > > they are running, and the open ports. > > > > > > > > - new machine alert - notify me of new machines that start > > > > listening on a block of IPs > > > > > > > > - web based and web configurable > > > > > > > > - handle several thousand hosts > > > > > > > > - elaborate alert notification system > > > > > > > > > I use NetSaint which is a very good tool but is not auto-configurable. It relies >on you telling which hosts to monitor and for what services. Sincerily, after trying >a few tools performing "auto-discovering" of the network I prefer to type all data >into NetSaint. It is very flexible, configurable and reliable, besides meeting your >requirements except for the first. > > > > > > NetSaint does not support your second requirement out-of-the-box (new machine >alert) but I can imagine many easy ways to configure it to do this. If you are >willing to start a new project, I beg you to join the NetSaint developers and provide >your extra features as a plug-in. > > > > > > > > > []s, Fernando Lozano > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Redhat-list mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Redhat-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > Regards, > > Lorris J. Woods > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: RE: Perl Problem > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:25:20 -0500 > From: Steve Sapovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Not really a DBI problem but ... > > All the ftp methods return undef on error, at which point > you can use standard Perl error checking to do whatever. > > put() and get() return the filename on success (remote or > local) if you need that info. > > See the Net::FTP docs. They're pretty clear. > > There is also a Net::FTP Timeout attribute that defaults to > 2 minutes. You might try setting that lower and see if it > still hangs. I've never had Net::FTP hang beyond its timeout > period. > > ---- > Steve Sapovits > Global Sports Interactive > Work Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Home Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Work Phone: 610-491-7087 > Cell: 610-574-7706 > Pager: 877-239-4003 > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ted Hilts [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 11:34 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Perl Problem > > > > I have a ftp upload routine written in perl that I run from with a LAN > > and out onto the internet via a gateway/firewall machine and the perl > > routine occasionally hangs or develops a socket problem. Most of the > > time it works fine but there are times it doesn't and I want to be able > > to work around the problem. > > > > Is there a way of placing a timout within the code such that if a > > specific ftp operation fails or hangs that the perl routine can respond. > > > > The features of the code look like this, and I have left out variable > > definitions and most of the code and included just enough so you know > > the utilities and type of operations... > > > > # Open the connection to the host > > $ftp = Net::FTP->new($hostname); # construct object > > $ftp->login($username, $password); # log in > > > > $ftp->cwd($home),"\n"; # change directory > > print $ftp->ls($home),"\n"; # list the directory > > > > > > $ftp->get($filename); > > $ftp->get('index.html', 'hostedindex.html' ); > > > > $ftp->put('/ted/temporary/fromindex.html','fromindex.html'); > > > > > > As I said I have left out most of the code. The code works most of the > > time. Its failure is not the issue. The issue is what can I imbed > > within the code in order to detect that one of the "$ftp" steps did not > > successfully complete. If a socket problem develops the code fails. If > > a perl syntax error exist the code fails. But if it hangs it hangs! > > Most likely the problem causing the hang is not perl related and so perl > > cannot respond to it. In fact I think that it is a networking problem > > at a level that leaves the perl running but unable to do anything. That > > is why I am looking for some kind of timeout solution. > > > > Any help would be appreciated in this regard. > > > > Bye-thanks_TED > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: RE: Perl - Time Tracking > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 18:22:57 -0600 > From: "Steve Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Ted, > > Have you tried the date-calc module available for PERL? You should be able > to do this with this module, and some good programming on your part. > > Steve Howard > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ted > Hilts > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 10:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Perl - Time Tracking > > This is my second perl problem. > > I have this ftp routine and want to be able to measure the time > associated with each step in the routine. You can see a routine snippet > on the list where I submitted the first problem and it is called Perl > Problem. > > Before each $ftp step I want to be able to set up a condition so that > when the step completes I can determine how long the $ftp step took. So > I want an ongoing determination of the time in the form of time > durations, not just a print out of what time it is. By this means I can > monitor the routine and become aware of any problems. Also, I would > like to be able (withing the perl code) to detect any time durations > exceeding a specified amount. > > Thanking you in advance for any help. > > Bye-thanks_TED > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: Pentuim 4 an RH6.2 > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:16:59 +0800 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Appologies if this has been covered before: > > I have come across some references on the difficulties of installing older > RH distributions on a Pentium 4 machine (CPUID database doesnt list this > processor)- there is supposed to be a work-around on the redhat site which > I cannot find, can someone post a reference for it please. > > BillK > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: log messages <sc 0(55,c,0)> fill disk > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:09:17 -0500 > From: Dan Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Can anyone tell me what these messages mean in /var/log/messages > > There are TONS of them, filling up the disk! > >Mar 11 04:02:03 hepsu04 syslogd 1.3-3: restart. > >Mar 11 04:01:56 hepsu04 kernel: sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc > >0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc > > 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc > > 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55, > >c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc > >0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)>< > >sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc > >0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(5 > >5,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc > >0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0) > > ><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc > > 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0 > >(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc > >0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c, > >0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc > >0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><sc 0(55,c,0)><s > > Thanks! > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dan Kirkpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Computer Systems Manager > Department of Physics > Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY > http://www.phy.syr.edu/~dkirk Fax: (315) 443-9103 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: linuxconf > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:48:46 +0200 > From: Peter Peltonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Organization: Fivetec Solutions Oy > To: RH List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > What is the most stable release of linuxconf that I should consider running on > RH6.2? > > Cheers, > Peter > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list Tons of mail incoming suggestion please I have a friend that get a ton of mail and sendmail had problem with openfile..........then, I installed postfix and no problem with openfile but now there is a lot of mail in the mailq........seems it grows everyday. It's running a scsi IBM 18 GIG drive which is not the greatest but ...works ok. I read that postfix will put mail in mailq if the drive is slow.......but's it's a scsi !! Any suggestion would be appriciated on how to make this server accepting all this email since it's a mail server for search engine submissions. THANKS, REMO _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
