I figured it out. It is embarrassing but that's just the way things go. I
have dual NIC cards and the one that came with the system appears to be eth1
while the one I added is eth0. I thought the NIC that came with the system
was eth0 but I found out it wasn't. I do appreciate your assistance and I
would hope that this would be my last mistake like this but probably will
not be. Such is life.
Thanks,
Craig Morse
PFN
Engineer
253.284.3006
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael R. Jinks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 12:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPSec and Network Configuration
Craig Morse wrote:
>
> I am not insulted, but yes all the other machines are configured
and working
> via TCP/IP. I am dual booting the machines with Windows and I am
able to
> access the network in Windows.
Okay, good to know.
> After I put the entry in the host file I was
> able to ping the address, "10.10.10.20."
That's really odd, the hosts file shouldn't matter for that, maybe I
misinterpreted your first posting about the GUI networking utility.
What does the output of "ifconfig eth0" look like?
How about "netstat -nr"?
--
~~~Michael Jinks, IB // Technical Entity // Saecos Corporation~~~
With all due respect to Kenny Rogers,
the best that you can hope for is a return code of zero.
Opinions expressed above are my own, and not those of my computer.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
