if I download the ISO i have to burn it right? I want to download the files to the disk so I can run the installation from it. please advise. thx. Gilbert --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Send Redhat-list mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, > visit > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body > 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it > is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Redhat-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: NTFS Support in Redhat 7.2 (Statux) > 2. Re: ntp client for Win2000 (Matthew Simpson) > 3. Re: NTFS Support in Redhat 7.2 (J Hayward) > 4. RE: Samba woes (Alexander Shaw) > 5. RE: jdk1.3.1 not finding files in current > directory: post script (Green, Aaron) > 6. Re: POP before SMTP (Mike Burger) > 7. upgrading 7.1 to 7.2 (Gilbert Goldstein) > 8. Re: Samba woes (Patrick "The Great Unclean > One" Lankhorst) > 9. RE: Samba woes (Dale Kosan) > 10. RE: Networking: Last Call Before I Quit > (Alexander Shaw) > 11. Clustering - Piranha - LVS - etc.. :( (Ashwin > Kutty) > 12. lpd and hostname problem (Jason Jesso) > 13. Re: upgrading 7.1 to 7.2 (Ed Wilts) > 14. RE: Networking: Last Call Before I Quit (Dale > Kosan) > 15. Adding additional hard drives (Alexander Shaw) >
> ATTACHMENT part 3.1 message/rfc822 > Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 01:07:12 -0500 (EST) > From: Statux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: NTFS Support in Redhat 7.2 > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Last I knew, only partial write support was > implemented. NTFS is prolly > one of those fstypes where the OS (NT) doesn't have > all of the details and > functionality of the fs simply laid out like other > filesystems. Like.. > they may hide stuff inside a file on the fs or > something thus causing it > to get confusing.. I have no idea really.. just > speculation. Remember, > NTFS was developed by MS and even if you have write > abilities.. don't > expect a clean write :) > > On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Anthony Abby wrote: > > > Has anyone had any experience with mounting NTFS > > partitions with the base Redhat 7.2 kernal? I > want to > > recompile my kernal (first I've ever done it) so I > can > > read and write files on my laptop (dual booted). > Does > > the NTFS support support read and write??? > > > > Thanks > > Anthony > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site > hosting, just $8.95/month. > > http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Redhat-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > - -- > - -Statux > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: pgpenvelope 2.10.2 - > http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/ > > iD8DBQE8AIqTZriHHoi+4toRAkTJAJ9HxKT4xg5HaE93vwPe/1Am8g7U1wCcDwbB > XqQdUxVy1yuzkjCKKF3k6bs= > =yIyz > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 3.2 message/rfc822 > Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 17:43:14 +1100 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: Matthew Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: ntp client for Win2000 > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi Tony, > > Thanks for your reply. I really need this for > standalone, off site > Win2k machines. Heres the scenario: > > > User dials into there ISP (using Win98 or 2k) > Sets time via NTP server > Rsync runs pulling data from our server > Logs out > > Setting the time is very important for rsync use and > it is also > important how simple the ntp client is to setup and > having no GUI > means the user can't change the settings. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated.. > > Matt > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Matthew Simpson wrote: > >>We really require a command line ntp tool that we > can simply use in a > >>DOS batch file much like the "ntpdate" program in > the unix ntpd > >>package. Any clues? > > > >Does is really *have* to be NTP? If you have a > synchronized box on the > >local network, the NET TIME command works well: > > > > NET TIME /SET /YES \\SERVERNAME > > > >The server must be a Winbox or a Samba box with > "time server = yes" > >set in smb.conf. It doesn't have to have any > shares, but Samba must be > >running. > > > >Tony > >- -- > >Anthony E. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/> > >OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 > C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D > >Chat: AOL/Yahoo: TonyG05 > >Linux. The choice of a GNU generation > <http://www.linux.org/> > > > > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > >Comment: Anthony E. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 0x6C94239D > > > >iD8DBQE7/gM+pCpg3WyUI50RApgZAKDvcafnCJDlYOCMZXM/JBqDQhSfNwCff61f > >uqYPukr/zjOpVLfP0tn8qeo= > >=Cv6E > >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Redhat-list mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 3.3 message/rfc822 > From: J Hayward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: NTFS Support in Redhat 7.2 > Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 23:13:31 -0800 > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Saturday 24 November 2001 09:26 pm, you wrote: > > Has anyone had any experience with mounting NTFS > > partitions with the base Redhat 7.2 kernal? I > want to > > recompile my kernal (first I've ever done it) so I > can > > read and write files on my laptop (dual booted). > Does > > the NTFS support support read and write??? > > > > If you are going to try ntfs support enable > read-only support. There have > been a couple of bugs filed on ntfs support on 7.2. > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55687 > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676 > > Regards, > Jim H > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 3.4 message/rfc822 > From: "Alexander Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Samba woes > Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 08:27:10 -0000 > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Dale Kosan said: > > > Do you have "encrypt passwords = yes" in your > /etc/samba/smb.conf file? > > Do you mean I should have, or I shouldn't have? > > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 3.5 message/rfc822 > From: "Green, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: jdk1.3.1 not finding files in current > directory: post script > Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 03:41:42 -0500 > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This really has nothing to do with your classpath. > Your wanting it to compile both files, so the VM > looking for *.class files would do you no good. If > your .java files are in /home/john/java/Assignment6/ > then just compile the program while in the java > directory using javac Assignment6/foo2.java If > this does not work, then simply put a package > Assignment6; statement at the beginning of each > file, and do the same thing. Let me know if this > generates any errors. > > > ---------- > > From: John P. Verel[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 10:21 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: jdk1.3.1 not finding files in > current directory: post script > > > > Right, my current directory is in my classpath for > both machines. But > > javac in windows sees the .java files and compiles > them,, the Linux > > javac does not. Your example below is consistent > with mine on Linux. > > Question why I get differing behavior on the > windows machine. > > > > John > > On 11/24/01, 11:04:27PM -0500, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, John P. Verel wrote: > > > > > > > I may have not stated the question correctly. > > > > > > No, I understood. I may have not stated the > answer clearly. > > > > > > > I have two files, foo1.java and foo2.java > foo2.java imports foo1. On my > > > > Windows machine, I can simply execute javac > foo2.java and javac compiles > > > > foo1.java and foo2.java. Same jdk on Linux > does not. In neither case do I > > > > have a classpath set. On my windows machine, > I have a dot at the end of the > > > > path search to denote the current address. I > had expected the Linux version to > > > > automatically find foo1.java compile it and > import the class file into foo2, > > > > but that is not happening. > > > > > > > > If I compile foo1.java first, then compile > foo2, all works fine. > > > > > > Then . is in your classpath :) > > > > > > > > > [cgalpin@kanga jdktest]$ rpm -q jdk > > > jdk-1.3.1-fcs > > > [cgalpin@kanga jdktest]$ echo $CLASSPATH > > > > > > [cgalpin@kanga jdktest]$ cat foo*.java > > > > > > class foo1 > > > { > > > void bark() > > > { > > > System.out.println("woof"); > > > } > > > } > > > > > > import foo1; > > > > > > class foo2 > > > { > > > public static void main(String []args) > > > { > > > System.out.println("sit"); > > > new foo1().bark(); > > > } > > > } > > > [cgalpin@kanga jdktest]$ !rm > > > rm *~ *.class > > > rm: cannot remove `*~': No such file or > directory > > > rm: cannot remove `*.class': No such file or > directory > > > [cgalpin@kanga jdktest]$ javac foo2.java > > > foo2.java:2: cannot resolve symbol > > > symbol: class foo1 > > > import foo1; > > > ^ > > > foo2.java:9: cannot resolve symbol > > > symbol : class foo1 > > > location: class foo2 > > > new foo1().bark(); > > > ^ > > > 2 errors > > > [cgalpin@kanga jdktest]$ javac -classpath . > foo2.java > > > [cgalpin@kanga jdktest]$ java foo2 > > > sit > > > woof > > > [cgalpin@kanga jdktest]$export CLASSPATH=. > > > [cgalpin@kanga jdktest]$ rm *.class > > > [cgalpin@kanga jdktest]$ javac foo2.java > > > [cgalpin@kanga jdktest]$ java foo2 > > > sit > > > woof > > > [cgalpin@kanga jdktest]$ > > > > > > > > > Ok, so if you put the directory you are > developing in your classpath > > > (since you are not using a package it is the > current dir) javac is able to > > > find foo1. Obviously it's in your classpath on > the windows box. > > > > > > hth > > > charles > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Redhat-list mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > -- > > John P. Verel > > Living Proof That Low Tech Beats High Tech! > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Redhat-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 3.6 message/rfc822 > Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 03:46:59 -0500 (EST) > From: Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: POP before SMTP > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "btree"? > > Am I correct in my understanding, then, that you're > running "makemap > btree virtusertable < virtusertable"? > > The default for virtusertable, etc, is "hash". Try > "makemap hash > virtusertable < virtusertable", and see if that > works. > > On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Steve Lee wrote: > > > Okay. the upgrade has really broken my mail > server. > > Luckily i can still use it but make no > modification. > > I was able to Drac to work by reinstalling the > > version of sendmail-8.11.0-8.i386.rpm. > > > > When i remake the btree for all the generic and > virtual > > user table, it still doesn't work. I thnk i need > to find > > out all the packages that are involved to make > sendmail > > work like before, redhat 7.1. that includes all > the > > packages that is required for makemap ( btree ), > etc... > > > > does anyone know what i would need to reinstall > using rpm. > > I guess i will go ahead and do a > > rpm -e --nodeps <all packages for sendmail, db, > etc> > > > > rpm -Uvh <all packages for sendmail, db, etc, > older version that worked> > > > > > > what packages are involved. ? > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 3.7 message/rfc822 > Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 01:17:32 -0800 (PST) > From: Gilbert Goldstein > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: upgrading 7.1 to 7.2 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Is available an upgrade from RedHat? If yes does it > have an installation program? Where can I find it? > > Thanks. > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, > just $8.95/month. > http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 3.8 message/rfc822 > From: "Patrick \"The Great Unclean One\" Lankhorst" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Samba woes > Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 11:16:20 +0100 > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Dale Kosan said: > > > > > Do you have "encrypt passwords = yes" in your > /etc/samba/smb.conf file? > > > > Do you mean I should have, or I shouldn't have? > > > You should set it to "yes". > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Redhat-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 3.9 message/rfc822 > Subject: RE: Samba woes > From: Dale Kosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Redhat List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 25 Nov 2001 06:28:57 -0500 > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Here is part of my samba.conf file: > > > #======================= Global Settings > ===================================== > [global] > smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd > printing = lprng > dns proxy = no > security = user > null passwords = no > encrypt passwords = yes > workgroup = HOME > server string = Samba Server > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 > SO_SNDBUF=8192 > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > netbios name = Gandalf > load printers = yes > printcap name = /etc/printcap > max log size = 0 > > > Hope this helps..... > > > You can also download Webmin, it is a good gui for > alot of > administration chores. > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 3.10 message/rfc822 > From: "Alexander Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Networking: Last Call Before I Quit > Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 13:46:27 -0000 > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Ben said: > > Well, glad to hear I'm not alone. But what on earth > could be wrong with > this? So, you don't think it's a hardware problem, > then? Or, maybe the isos > were corrupted? Makes a fella appreciate Gates :-} > BenO > > Hang on in there Ben, it will start to make some > sense eventually. When it > gets to 'blow a gasket' stage take the advice from > the Samba How-to's and go > have a coffee or 12 and then come back to it. > > Seriously though search out as many newsgroups as > you can, especially those > that deal with the specifics of your system. I even > found one for the > particular dial-up account I have. > > Success for this weekend has been the Ip-tables and > getting Samba doing > something about correct. When it goes right it makes > you feel good. > > Alex > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 3.11 message/rfc822 > Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 10:04:02 -0400 > From: Ashwin Kutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Clustering - Piranha - LVS - etc.. :( > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, > > I have been banging my head over the keyboard with > this and have gotten > nowhere.. I have been trying to get some sort of > guidance in terms of docs > as to how I could setup a two node cluster using > RH7.2 & piranha but with > no luck.. After checking at the LVS site and > Redhat's HA site I still > havent been able to successfully get anywheres.. I > was wondering if > someone could tell me of a site where I could find > some detailed docs > about doing this and/or help me out further.. > > The specs of machines are:- > RH7.2 > 2 10/100 Nic's on each.. > I want one to be both the real and the virtual > server and the other to be > a virtual server.. > They are connected via a SMC switch on the second > NIC.. > Each eth0's on both machines are registered with > different names currently > I was also hoping for load balancing, replication > and a FOS type operation > with LVS.. > > Any ideas would be great.. > > > Thank you.. > > > > ATTACHMENT part 3.12 message/rfc822 > From: Jason Jesso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: lpd and hostname problem > Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 09:09:21 -0500 > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > As of yesterday I noticed that my server name is > something like > CPE0060673AABA9 > > I think rogers cable is changing things. I use > dhcp. > > In /etc/dhcpc/dhcpcd-eth0.info I see > > HOSTNAME=CPE0060673AABA9 > > Now when I start lpd I get the following error: > > 0:jason> ./lpd start > Starting lpd: 2001-11-25-09:00:07.894 > Get_local_host: hostname > 'CPE0060673AABA9' bad > > How can I fix this? > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 3.13 message/rfc822 > Subject: Re: upgrading 7.1 to 7.2 > From: Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 25 Nov 2001 08:13:07 -0600 > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Sun, 2001-11-25 at 03:17, Gilbert Goldstein > wrote: > > Is available an upgrade from RedHat? If yes does > it > > have an installation program? Where can I find it? > > The 7.2 package allows you to upgrade from 7.1. You > can download the 7.2 > ISOs or purchase the media and documention. If you > purchased 7.1, you > can get a $20 rebate on your 7.2 purchase. > > .../Ed > > -- > Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 3.14 message/rfc822 > Subject: RE: Networking: Last Call Before I Quit > From: Dale Kosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Redhat List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 25 Nov 2001 09:17:26 -0500 > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Dont give up hope yet Ben, good things come to > those who wait. Read all > you can and watch this list. I was like you about a > year ago, now I only > go into Windows XP to play Counterstrike. Everything > I need or want to > do I can do with Linux. Endeaver to come out on top > and you will. > > The one piece of advise I can give is one thing at > a time, get it right > and move onto the next, baby steps or you will feel > over whelmed.I am > running 7.2 and have had no major issues as of yet. > Feel free to contact > me off list with your issues and we will try and > work thru them one at a > time. I do not know all but may be able to help. Did > you check the md5 > sums of the downloaded ISO'S? > > Good luck and keep the faith...... > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 3.15 message/rfc822 > From: "Alexander Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Adding additional hard drives > Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 15:03:00 -0000 > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I've now got my system up and running and want to > add an extra hard drive. > > Have searched the net and can't find the answers. > How exactly do I do it, > and is it possible (and sensible) to create four > partitions on the one drive > and turn it into RAID device to hopefully speed up > the transfer of the large > files I like to move around? > > Alex > > _______________________________________________ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
