"Matthews, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was under the assumption that GCC 3.0.2 or GCC 2.95.3 would be the > best bets for stability. I thought that the use of GCC 2.96 was > discouraged.
The other way round. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
