Must be a difference in our versions. Last time I looked at Outlook 2000 the
"new mail account" option you describe was not present. Perhaps my copy of
outlook was too simple? I was using Outlook from office 2k standard, not
deluxe or professional or anything. I don't have office 2k anymore, and
don't care.
I have not looked in Outlook XP because I don't have it installed (and don't
really WANT it installed. Outlook Express works great for my needs and is
MUCH smaller). so what you describe could be there in XP. I won't say either
way. No HDD space to waste with that program.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jason Costomiris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: IMAP secure or insecure?
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:54:31PM -0700, Dan Egli wrote:
> : Could have fooled me. I have Outlook 2000 and Outlook XP and while I
ahve
> : not looked at XP I could never figure out how to define ANYTHING but a
pop3
> : or a Exchange server. Mind sharing the wealth of knowledge so I know
what to
> : do next time I am cursed with having to use OutLook?
>
> At the risk of sounding flip, it's simple. Open your eyes.
>
> Go into Outlook 2000 or XP and add a new account. The first question is
> about what kind of account it is, whether it's POP3, IMAP, HTTP
> (like hotmail), Exchange or the ever popular, "other".
>
>
> --
> Jason Costomiris <>< | Technologist, geek, human.
> jcostom {at} jasons {dot} org | http://www.jasons.org/
> Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
> My account, My opinions.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
