On Mar 04 Dic 2001 18:28, you wrote:
> Hi Mart�n,
>
> On Tuesday, December 04, 2001, 4:22:24 PM, you babbled something about:
>
> MM> I have a question for the people of RH. Why is the default
> configuration of MM> sendmail in RH 7.2 (and I was told in 7.1 too) is to
> only listen to the MM> loopback device, and not to the ethernets?
>
> I think it is a great idea. Much fewer open relays from default installs.
> Now if only Exchange and Domino would do this, there would be a lot less
> spam.
In that case, why not keep blocking with the NO-RELEY, and add the relay
hosts to /etc/mail/relay-domains?
> MM> Is there a solution for making a MTA server,that doesn't mean compiling
> with MM> m4 the sendmail.mc after the apropiate configuration?
>
> Yes, but it is not the "recommended way" of doing it.
>
> Simply comment out the line that looks like this...
> # O DaemonPortOptions=Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA
>
> in your /etc/sendmail.cf
I'm not the person who had the problem, but I am at this moment downloading
sendmail-8.11.6 and would like to know 2 things:
1) Those this sendmail have the default configuration described before?
2) One of the machines I'll update is and old RH which happens to have only
one package of sendmail, and now there are 3 (the package, the -cf and the
doc). Which are mandatory?
Saludos... :-)
--
Porqu� usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si pod�s usar PostgreSQL?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mart�n Marqu�s | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
