Hi Monte,
> http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=01/12/10/2014239
>
> I asked the people at KRUD,
> and they at least don't feel like they'd be affected by it.
That's obvious, because they don't use the name RedHat. Although I am curious
about the "RedHat basedness" and if they may call it such...
> Opinions, comments?
What struck me as particulary odd is the fact that the letter states that by
using the name "RedHat" Phillips is "infringing Red Hat's intellectual
property rights". Since when has a trademark anything to do with intellectual
property rights? And what kind of lawyers does RH hire who use "intellectual
property rights" in such a context? Maybe RH should explain the GPL to their
lawyer.
All in all I think this behaviour stinks >:-(.
Bye,
Leonard.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
