On Fri, 2001-12-21 at 06:56, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Linda, > > Anthony wrote: > > > If you can use a simpler implementation that excels on reads, > > use MySQL. > > > > I prefer PostgreSQL because it has everything I'll need and the latest > > versions are also fast enough that speed is not an issue. > > So if you just need to access a few tables and you implement the queries in > software (PHP, perl) mysql is probably the speediest solution. This is the > case for many webservers. > If you want to setup a "real" SQL database you should go with postgresql. But > for simple purposes it's probably not as fast as mysql.
I think Anthony's point is that you won't notice any lack of performance form postgresql so you might as well use it, since it's a better choice long term. charles _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
