Well.. it may feel slower and more complicated than the BSD distros but considering that almost anyone can setup a linux server/workstation as easily as they can setup a windoze box... I'd say RedHat has made some good progress.
I started with RedHat 4.x way back when. Most windoze users wouldn't feel comfortable installing 4.x compared to 7.x Consider it from the end user perspective. This is another reason microsoft is soo popular (one of many). It doesn't take brains to install a Windoze distro... They simply haven't been weened from the GUI :-) >Hm - I have no experience with FreeBSD, but if their installation is in >any >way similar to OpenBSD, I'd say it's dead-easy for anyone who can read. >Compared to OpenBSD, the RHL installer feels very slow and complicated. >However, having said that, OpenBSD expects the user to do more himself >*after* the install, i.e. no automatic firewall setup, no automatic user >account setup, etc. - just a different philosophy, I think. > >Cheeriom > >Thomas > _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
