> > to release 3.1 on a Red Hat 7.1 system. > > (btw there is no GCC 3.1 - the latest release is 3.0.3)
Actually, RedHat has modified the gcc 3.03 released to suit their own needs, and has dubbed it 3.1. It's not a GNU release. Just like 2.96 is a Redhat gcc release whereas 2.95 is the GNU release. My Opinion, go to gcc-2.95. I upgraded to 3.1, and had troubles compiling programs. I was going to drop down to gcc-3.03, but I was reading lists where they were complaining about other various compiling bugs as well. So I dropped down the 2.95. No more compiling problems :) They do come in rpm format, however, it isn't RedHat rpms. They are PLD rpms. (Polished Linux Distro). I manually removed ALL gcc and stdlib rpms, and replaced them with the gcc-2.95 from that distro, and everything worked great. I think redhat only needed some libgcc-3.1 rpm to function som programs that needed special libraries. The only bad thing about mixing distro RPM's is satisfying the dependencies. -- -Rob _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
