[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Send Redhat-list mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Redhat-list digest..." > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >Today's Topics: > > 1. NFS problem (Marko Frelih) > 2. RE: Java Experts (Lyn) > 3. Re: What kernel RPM packages to install from Rawhide? (Matthew Galgoci) > 4. Re: Help with name issues DNS and Cox.net (Matthew Galgoci) > 5. Re: IBM Microdrive (Matthew Galgoci) > 6. Re: (no subject) (Matthew Galgoci) > 7. Re: Mounting vfat partition: logical sector size 0? (Matthew Galgoci) > 8. increasing number of allowed processes per user (Rob Saul) > 9. Re: Blown BIOS, no boot (John P Verel) > 10. DHCP completely new to me - please help (Edward Dekkers) > 11. Re: DHCP completely new to me - please help (Bret Hughes) > 12. RE: DHCP completely new to me - please help (Linux) > 13. Re: Redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #3737 - 19 msgs (Michael Moore) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > > NFS problem > From: > > "Marko Frelih" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > > Fri, 1 Feb 2002 22:34:24 +0100 > To: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >I have an laptop with CDROM malfunction and I want to install linux via NFS >server. I've established nfs server succesfully, but linuxconf doesn't want >to mount nfs system with cdrom source. What is wrong?? > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > > RE: Java Experts > From: > > "Lyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > > Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:41:23 -0800 > To: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >If you use KDE, the KDE System guard is probably the best for this purpose. >When you open it up, go to the list of Processes. Go to the check box that >says Tree down at the bottom. This will show you the hierarchy of >processes. This will help determine which one to kill (top most usually). >If your running multiple java programs it might take some guess work at >first but I can usually determine what it is fairly quickly by seeing how >many sub-processes are spawned by either program. > >Lyn Mortensen >Programmer >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >InTransit Inc. >www.intransit.com > > > > > >|-----Original Message----- >|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Saul >|Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:23 PM >|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >|Subject: Re: Java Experts >| >| >| >|Can't think of anything off the top of my head, but you might >|try asking >|on the linux-java list ( see www.blackdown.org for info ). >| >|On Friday 01 February 2002 09:44, you wrote: >|> Any Java experts out there? I have JDK 1.3.1 installed on >|Redhat 7.2. I >|> have an application that opens up several java processes. I >|have another >|> app that I want to run, but I want to be able to kill it. Is >|there a way of >|> telling the difference in the java processes? Right now when >|I run it and >|> do a ps -ef | grep java, expectedly it just lists all the >|java processes. >|> >|> On Netware you can do a java -show and it lists the >|processes, I believe by >|> the class file that started them. Any equivalent command on >|JDK for Linux? >|> >|> Thanks, >|> James >|> >| >| >|-- >|Rob Saul.:|:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:|:.de recta non tolerandum sunt >| >| >| >|_______________________________________________ >|Redhat-list mailing list >|[EMAIL PROTECTED] >|https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >| > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > > Re: What kernel RPM packages to install from Rawhide? > From: > > Matthew Galgoci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > > Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:31:04 -0500 > To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 07:03:47PM -0200, José Romildo Malaquias wrote: > >>Hello. >> >>I am going to rebuild and install the binary RPM packages of the Linux >>kernel from Rawhide in my RedHat Linux 7.2 box. I am not sure what >>packages can be safely installed while trying to keep the system >>well integrated. In particular, it seems that the glibc and the >>kernel-headers packages are tied together, that is, I should not >>install the Rawhide kernel-headers. Currently I have the following >>kernel packages installed: >> >> kernel-2.4.7-10 (i686) >> kernel-2.4.9-21 (i686) >> kernel-headers-2.4.9-21 >> kernel-source-2.4.9-21 >> >>I want to keep them and also install the new ones >> >> kernel-2.4.17-0.12 (i686) >> kernel-source-2.4.17-0.12 >> > >You will need to grab the following src.rpm packages from rawhide, recompile them, >and install them in order to be able to install rawhide kernels without unsatisfied >dependencies: > >MAKEDEV (and the dev package that is produced by recompiling the MAKEDEV src.rpm) >modutils >initscripts > >>Will the new kernel-headers be needed for something, like compiling >>third party kernel modules (like avfs and alsa) for the new kernel, >>or can I just disregard it? >> > >kernel-headers are used in conjunction with glibc-devel to allow you to compile >period. kernel-headers should not be used to compile external kernel modules. > >There is really no need to upgrade kernel-headers in your situation. > >>Thanks. >> >>Romildo >>-- >>Prof. José Romildo Malaquias Departamento de Computação >>http://iceb.ufop.br/~romildo Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Brasil >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Redhat-list mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > > Re: Help with name issues DNS and Cox.net > From: > > Matthew Galgoci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > > Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:38:14 -0500 > To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 12:24:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I have been struggling with the changeover from Cox@home to Cox.net in the >>past week and I have hit a cross-roads. I need assistance with >>troubleshooting some DNS issues that I'm having. >> >>I'm running RH 7.1 with IPmasquerading and IPCHAINS. >> >>My problems are as follows: >> >>1) Cox now requires DHCP, so I shifted eth0 to DHCP and it picks up the >>address just fine and the DNS servers. But they also issue dynamic >>hostnames with every lease. So in their literature they say that you can >>use anything for hostname. But if I do, then I can't resolve my hostname >>when I bootup...I fixed this by changing the hosts file to resolve my >>current hostname to my current address. But what happens when the address >>changes....I'm hosed again. >> > >You can fudge a random hostname as an alias to 127.0.0.1 in /etc/hosts and >by setting the random hostname in /etc/sycconfig/network. This will keep >your machine mostly happy but is an ugly hack. > >>2) My internal clients cannot access the support.cox.net site at all. I >>think that this has something to do with the fact that they are masq'd and >>they have different domain suffixes? maybe... >> > >I doubt it. Look elsewhere. Try tcpdumping on the gateway box while your clients >are trying to hit support.cox.net and see what happens. Also take a good hard look >at your network setup. > >Besides, if cox was able to detect NATed connections, they could do far worse things >than block access to their support site. > >>3) internal clients can't access Mail. I think for the same reason listed >>above. They can ping the server, but are denied access, even when I put the >>fixed IP of the mail server into the box. >> > >Again, look at your network/firewall setup. > >>4)DNS confuses the hell out of me and I can't get my mind around the >>problem. >> > >Heh. It gets worse when you try and run dns yourself ;-) > > >Matt > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > > Re: IBM Microdrive > From: > > Matthew Galgoci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > > Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:40:36 -0500 > To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 12:16:26PM -0500, James Vellenga wrote: > >>Hi everyone, >> >>I have an old laptop that uses a pcmcia harddrive. The old drive died a >>while back filled with back sectors, and I have been looking for a >>replacement. Linux does work on the system with the pcmcia hard drive, >>but for replacement of it a person suggested using a Compact Flash card >>with pcmcia adaptor. As I have been shopping I have been considering >>going with an IBM micro-drive with a pcmcia adaptor. I was wondering >>does anyone know if either of these options will work with linux? >> > >Micro drives should work fine with linux, but I have yet to see a laptop >that will allow you to boot from any kind of pcmcia device. Booting will >probably be your primary problem, > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > > Re: (no subject) > From: > > Matthew Galgoci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > > Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:44:07 -0500 > To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 11:47:25AM -0500, Ryan Hamilton Madison wrote: > >>Hello, >> I recently upgraded to RH 7.2. I notice some disk activity hitting the root >>disk every couple seconds. I don't know what it is, and am having a tough >>time figuring it out... I got rid of most of the cron entries, and stopped >> > >It's probably ext3 committing the journal every 5 seconds. Syslog could also be >a responsible for synchronous disk writes on a regular basis. > >Matt > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > > Re: Mounting vfat partition: logical sector size 0? > From: > > Matthew Galgoci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > > Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:48:14 -0500 > To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >What does "/sbin/fdisk -l /dev/hda" print out? > >On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:19:03AM -0500, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > >> >> >>Hi, >> >>I have been trying to mount a vfat partition to no avail. I can >>mount /dev/hda1 which is the C drive of Win98. But I can't mount >>/dev/hda10 with the same options. Here is my /etc/fstab: >> >>LABEL=/ / ext3 defaults 1 1 >>none /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0 >>LABEL=/home /home ext3 defaults 1 2 >>none /proc proc defaults 0 0 >>none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0 >>LABEL=/tmp /tmp ext3 defaults 1 2 >>LABEL=/usr /usr ext3 defaults 1 2 >>LABEL=/usr/local /usr/local ext3 defaults 1 2 >>LABEL=/var /var ext3 defaults 1 2 >>/dev/hda3 swap swap defaults 0 0 >>/dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom iso9660 noauto,owner,kudzu,ro 0 0 >>/dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy auto noauto,owner,kudzu 0 0 >>/dev/hda1 /mnt/win98 vfat defaults,noauto 0 0 >>/dev/hda10 /mnt/data vfat defaults,noauto 0 0 >> >> >>When I try to mount the system this what I get: >> >>[root@localhost sbin]# mount /mnt/data >>mount : type fs incorrect, option incorrect, superbloc incorrect on /dev/hda10, >> or too many mounted file systems. >> >>Moreover, today I try to run fsck.vfat on /dev/hda10 and this is >>what I got: >> >>[root@localhost sbin]# fsck.vfat -r /dev/hda10 >>dosfsck 2.7, 14 Feb 2001, FAT32, LFN >>Logical sector size is zero. >> >>I think is pointing to the source of the error, but I do not know >>how to fix this. >> >>Thanks for any pointer on how to fix this ... >> >>Dominic >> >> >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Redhat-list mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > > increasing number of allowed processes per user > From: > > Rob Saul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > > Fri, 1 Feb 2002 19:06:59 -0800 > To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sigh, I've forgotten how to change the number of processes per >user allowed. Could some kind sole remind me? > >Thanks, > ~Rob > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > > Re: Blown BIOS, no boot > From: > > John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > > Fri, 1 Feb 2002 22:11:37 -0500 > To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Smells like a hardware problem. Last rights may be in order ;) ? The >LILO user's guide says that this type of error, "...usually indicates a >media failure or a geometry mismatch (e.g. bad disk parameters)....". >BIOS may be the place to start. > >John >On 02/01/02, 08:22:36AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>On 01/31/02, at 10:57 PM, John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >>>Did you get an error code along side the "L"? >>> >>No error code, just the "L". >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > > DHCP completely new to me - please help > From: > > "Edward Dekkers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > > Sat, 2 Feb 2002 11:34:42 +0800 > To: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >With the mini-howto, I HAVE gotten dhcpd up and running and it it serving >dynamic ip addresses OK. > >Previously, the clients were static, and I also used to fill in the >'gateway' ip, to allow the client to get on the internet. Now, when running >ipconfig on the clients, the gateway is empty. They have obviously picked up >on the DNS server correctly, because the internet addresses ARE being >translated correctly, however, pinging is a no go. > >I've also gone through 'man dhcpd.conf' and 'man 5 dhcpd-options' files, to >see if the dhcp server can insert this gateway value into the clients, but >I'm obviously misunderstanding how it is done because no option remotely >looks like what I need. > >What do I need to set up in my dhcpd.conf, for the clients to pick up the >default gateway? > >TIA. > >--- >Edward Dekkers (Director) >Triple D Computer Services Pty. Ltd. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > > Re: DHCP completely new to me - please help > From: > > Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > > 01 Feb 2002 21:45:35 -0600 > To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 21:34, Edward Dekkers wrote: > >>With the mini-howto, I HAVE gotten dhcpd up and running and it it serving >>dynamic ip addresses OK. >> >>Previously, the clients were static, and I also used to fill in the >>'gateway' ip, to allow the client to get on the internet. Now, when running >>ipconfig on the clients, the gateway is empty. They have obviously picked up >>on the DNS server correctly, because the internet addresses ARE being >>translated correctly, however, pinging is a no go. >> >>I've also gone through 'man dhcpd.conf' and 'man 5 dhcpd-options' files, to >>see if the dhcp server can insert this gateway value into the clients, but >>I'm obviously misunderstanding how it is done because no option remotely >>looks like what I need. >> >>What do I need to set up in my dhcpd.conf, for the clients to pick up the >>default gateway? >> >here are the first few lines in one of my dhcp servers > >subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { ># --- default gateway > option routers 192.168.0.1; > option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; > >HTH > >Bret > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > > RE: DHCP completely new to me - please help > From: > > Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > > Sat, 2 Feb 2002 17:12:03 +1300 > To: > > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Heres Mine > >server-name "Lennie"; >max-lease-time 260000; >default-lease-time 250000; >option netbios-node-type 8; >option domain-name "xyz.com"; >option netbios-name-servers 192.168.10.210; >option domain-name-servers 203.96.152.4 , 203.96.152.12; >option broadcast-address 192.168.10.255; >option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; >option routers 192.168.10.210; >subnet 192.168.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { > option netbios-node-type 8; > option netbios-name-servers 192.168.10.210; > option domain-name-servers 203.96.152.4 , 203.96.152.12; > option broadcast-address 192.168.10.255; > option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; > option routers 192.168.10.210; > max-lease-time 260000; > default-lease-time 250000; > range 192.168.10.100 192.168.10.200; > } > >Mike > > >This mail was processed by Mail essentials for Exchange/SMTP, >the email security & management gateway. Mail essentials adds >content checking, email encryption, anti spam, anti virus, >attachment compression, personalised auto responders, archiving >and more to your Microsoft Exchange Server or SMTP mail server. >For more information visit http://www.mailessentials.com > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > > Re: Redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #3737 - 19 msgs > From: > > Michael Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > > Fri, 01 Feb 2002 22:35:14 -0600 > To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Send Redhat-list mailing list submissions to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of Redhat-list digest..." >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems (Ed Wilts) >> 2. Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems (G. T. Francisco, III) >> 3. Second Circuit Ruling on source code (Michael Jang) >> 4. [Q] Why is rpm 4.0.4-0.23 is asking for already installed perl >> modules? (Maurice Volaski) >> 5. Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems (Brian Wright) >> 6. Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems (Brian Wright) >> 7. Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems (Brian Wright) >> 8. Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems (Brian Wright) >> 9. Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems (Fred Herman) >> 10. Re: Blown BIOS, no boot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >> 11. where is cfdisk in rh 7.2? (LuisMi) >> 12. (no subject) (Ryan Hamilton Madison) >> 13. kernel RPM upgrades change permissions on /boot/grub/grub.conf >> (Jim Breton) >> 14. Re: xdm default kde (Charles Marcus) >> 15. Portal Software (Kevin G. Hammond) >> 16. RE: root mail ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >> 17. Re: My Machine can't receive mail (Jack Wallen) >> 18. URGENT -> Vi problems (LuisMi) >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems >> From: >> >> "Ed Wilts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: >> >> Fri, 1 Feb 2002 18:47:24 -0600 >> To: >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >>> I just installed RH 7.2 on a rackmount with a RealTek 8139c ethernet >>> card. Running ifconfig brings up eth0 just fine, but when I try to >>> ping >>> any IP addy, I keep getting "destination host unreachable >>> >> >> I had this too on an 8139. It turned out to be a dead firewall >> port. Even >> though I had the link light on, the port was intermittent and was >> dead more >> than it was up (it actually worked at 10mbps but not 100mbps). So, try >> another cable, try another port on your hub/switch, and see if anything >> changes. >> >> Ed Wilts >> Mounds View, MN, USA >> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems >> From: >> >> "G. T. Francisco, III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: >> >> Fri, 1 Feb 2002 18:53:52 -0600 >> To: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 04:29:27PM -0800, Brian Wright said: >> >>> Hi, List! >>> >>> I just installed RH 7.2 on a rackmount with a RealTek 8139c ethernet >>> card. Running ifconfig brings up eth0 just fine, but when I try to >>> ping >>> any IP addy, I keep getting "destination host unreachable". >>> >> Are you able to ping yourself? Try "ping localhost" or "ping 127.0.0.1" >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> Second Circuit Ruling on source code >> From: >> >> "Michael Jang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: >> >> Fri, 1 Feb 2002 19:56:18 -0500 >> To: >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> Folks, >> >> I'm listening to a legal presentation on publishing from the Waterside >> writer's conference, and Jon Tandler of Isaacson, Rosenbaum, Woods & >> Levy, P.C. says there was a recent ruling by the Second Circuit Appeals >> court (I think it covers New York state and maybe CT) - that sounds like >> it goes beyond the GPL. >> >> Essentially, he's saying that Second Circuit ruling protects source code >> as free speech, as opposed to something that can be copyrighted. >> >> Tandler went on to say that the rulings of other US circuit courts are >> in conflict with this ruling. >> >> Can anyone here point me to the current case law for these rulings, as >> how they affect the GPL? What have other circuits said about source >> code, free speech, and copyright law? >> >> If this isn't the right forum, can you point me in the right direction? >> >> Thanks, >> Michael Jang >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> [Q] Why is rpm 4.0.4-0.23 is asking for already installed perl modules? >> From: >> >> Maurice Volaski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: >> >> Fri, 1 Feb 2002 20:05:39 -0500 >> To: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> I'm installing the components of rpm 4.04-0.23 on a RedHat 7.1 box >> and the current rpm (4.0.3-1.03) complains ... >> >> perl(Data::Dumper) is needed by rpm-build-4.0.4-0.23 >> perl(strict) is needed by rpm-build-4.0.4-0.23 >> perl(Sys::Hostname) is needed by rpm-build-4.0.4-0.23 >> >> But the installed perl (5.6.0-12) according to rpm seems to be >> providing everything... >> >> /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/strict.pm >> /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux/Sys/Hostname.pm >> /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux/Data/Dumper.pm >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems >> From: >> >> Brian Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: >> >> Fri, 01 Feb 2002 17:04:18 -0800 >> To: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> I've tried with 2 different cables on 2 different ports at the hub, and >> this didn't resolve the problem. >> During installation, I did set the firewall for medium, allowing ssh, >> telnet, mail, and web. I also set aside ports 10000 (webmin), 8080 >> (zope), 8090 (apache-frontpage) and 5432 (postgresql). Could these be >> interfering with it? >> >> --brian >> >>> I had this too on an 8139. It turned out to be a dead firewall >>> port. Even >>> though I had the link light on, the port was intermittent and was >>> dead more >>> than it was up (it actually worked at 10mbps but not 100mbps). So, try >>> another cable, try another port on your hub/switch, and see if anything >>> changes. >>> >>> Ed Wilts >>> Mounds View, MN, USA >>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Redhat-list mailing list >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems >> From: >> >> Brian Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: >> >> Fri, 01 Feb 2002 17:04:18 -0800 >> To: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> I've tried with 2 different cables on 2 different ports at the hub, and >> this didn't resolve the problem. >> During installation, I did set the firewall for medium, allowing ssh, >> telnet, mail, and web. I also set aside ports 10000 (webmin), 8080 >> (zope), 8090 (apache-frontpage) and 5432 (postgresql). Could these be >> interfering with it? >> >> --brian >> >>> I had this too on an 8139. It turned out to be a dead firewall >>> port. Even >>> though I had the link light on, the port was intermittent and was >>> dead more >>> than it was up (it actually worked at 10mbps but not 100mbps). So, try >>> another cable, try another port on your hub/switch, and see if anything >>> changes. >>> >>> Ed Wilts >>> Mounds View, MN, USA >>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Redhat-list mailing list >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems >> From: >> >> Brian Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: >> >> Fri, 01 Feb 2002 17:17:01 -0800 >> To: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >>> Are you able to ping yourself? Try "ping localhost" or "ping 127.0.0.1" >>> >> >> Yes, I can ping localhost and 127.0.0.1, and also the machine's assigned >> IP and domain name. >> >> --Brian >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems >> From: >> >> Brian Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: >> >> Fri, 01 Feb 2002 17:17:01 -0800 >> To: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >>> Are you able to ping yourself? Try "ping localhost" or "ping 127.0.0.1" >>> >> >> Yes, I can ping localhost and 127.0.0.1, and also the machine's assigned >> IP and domain name. >> >> --Brian >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems >> From: >> >> Fred Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: >> >> Fri, 01 Feb 2002 18:20:11 -0700 >> To: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> Try shutting off your firewall (temporarily). Depending on your rules, >> ping may be getting blocked. >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> Re: Blown BIOS, no boot >> From: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Date: >> >> Fri, 01 Feb 2002 20:22:05 -0500 >> To: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> On 02/01/02, at 06:15 PM, Mark Neidorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >>> Sounds like something is really wrong with that machine. Hmmm, was the >>> original battery rechargable & did you replace it with the same type of >>> rechargable? Is the voltage the same? >>> >> >> It was one of those Dallas Realtime Clocks, a 12887. Amazingly, it >> was in a socket, not soldered to the mobo. >> >>> What you are reporting sounds like something is intermittantly >>> connecting & >>> disconnecting. Perhaps it won't make a good router? >>> >> >> One suspicion is that one or more of the BIOS settings is now wrong, >> but I long ago forgot the little I knew about 1995 vintage BIOS'es. >> High on that suspect list is one called something like Large Disk >> Access Mode, the choices are DOS or Other. >> >> I'd really prefer to get lilo working. The floppy drive is known to >> be a bit flaky, so I would rather not rely on it for normal booting. >> According to my reading, the probable cause of lilo stopping at "L" >> is a "geometry mismatch". >> The hard drives were partitioned and formatted by the redhat >> installation, Server class. >> Advice? >> Things that I overlooked? >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> where is cfdisk in rh 7.2? >> From: >> >> LuisMi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: >> >> Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:04:34 +0100 (CET) >> To: >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> I can't find the cfdisk command into my redhat 7.2, where is it? >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> (no subject) >> From: >> >> "Ryan Hamilton Madison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: >> >> Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:47:25 -0500 >> To: >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> Hello, >> I recently upgraded to RH 7.2. I notice some disk activity >> hitting the root >> disk every couple seconds. I don't know what it is, and am having a >> tough >> time figuring it out... I got rid of most of the cron entries, and >> stopped >> several services from running, and left a fairly slimmed down system, >> and I >> still can't seem to figure out what is hitting the disk. Looking at >> /var/log/cron, the only thing left running every 10 minutes is >> /usr/lib/sa/sa1, and that activity does not co-incide with the >> activity I am >> hearing on the disk. >> Another file in /var/log that is often being updated is >> /var/log/pacct. >> Which I have figured out is the process accounting data file. I took >> a look >> at iostat, but that only showed me that there was activity on the >> disk, not >> what it was. I would like to know what's going on. fuser shows what's >> going >> on, but doesn't seem specific enough. >> Any suggestions on a tool to see what application is hitting the >> disk? - Or >> any suggestions on places to look. >> -Thanks, RYAN >> >> Ryan Hamilton Madison >> Chief Consultant >> escf.com >> w. http://ryo.escf.com/resume.html >> e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> kernel RPM upgrades change permissions on /boot/grub/grub.conf >> From: >> >> Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: >> >> Thu, 31 Jan 2002 23:29:23 +0000 >> To: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> Hi all. Been using Red Hat (7.2) for about a week or two now (was a >> Debian user for a couple years). I've been installing the Errata RPMs >> and I've noticed that when I install the kernel packages, they hose the >> permissions I've set on grub.conf. >> >> I set them non-world-readable because the file contains the hash of the >> bootloader password. Is there any way I can prevent the RPMs from >> changing this? Or should I file a bug report against the package? >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> Re: xdm default kde >> From: >> >> "Charles Marcus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: >> >> Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:32:43 -0500 >> To: >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm having a very similar problem with Redhat 7.2... >> >> None of the suggestions in this thread worked for me... >> >> This should be simple... >> >> Display Manager = "KDM" >> Desktop = "KDE" (or GNOME, or just a Window Manager).. >> >> Why is this so complicated?? >> >> >> ---------------- >> Charles >> >> p.s. >> please cc me as I am not subscribed to the list - thanks! >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> Portal Software >> From: >> >> "Kevin G. Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: >> >> Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:12:46 -0600 >> To: >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> Is there any decent portal software available for Linux? >> >> We are currently running vanilla RedHat 7.2. Anything that has a >> relatively pain free installation would be preferred. >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> RE: root mail >> From: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Date: >> >> Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:50:42 +0100 >> To: >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> In aliases db enter you mailaddress then make newaliases.. or place a >> .forward file in your root dir with your mailaddress in there >> >> cheers >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> On Behalf Of John Spooner >> Sent: Freitag, 01. Februar 2002 08:53 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: root mail >> >> how would I sent mail for root to my email account? >> -John >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Redhat-list mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> >> Re: My Machine can't receive mail >> From: >> >> Jack Wallen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: >> >> 01 Feb 2002 10:00:14 -0500 >> To: >> >> redhat list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> i just went through this. take a look at the /etc/mail/sendmail.mc file >> for this line: >> >> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA') >> >> you can either change it to: >> >> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=0.0.0.0, Name=MTA') >> >> or comment it out (i think that will work) >> >> and then rerun m4 on the file >> >> m4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > /etc/sendmail.cf >> >> and sendmail should now be accepting mail from outside of localhost. >> >> >> On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 09:55, Reuben D Budiardja wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> It seems that my machine cannot receive mail from outside. I am in >>> LAN network, and my machine has its name from DHCP, which stays the >>> same. I tried to change the file /etc/mail/local-host-names and add >>> my machine name there: >>> >>> machine_name.domain.edu >>> >>> and restart sendmail, but no result. When I send e-mail to >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED], it will just gone. >>> Any help on this? I am using Redhat 7.2, with the default sendmail >>> included. >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> Reuben D. Budiardja >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Redhat-list mailing list >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> Subject: >>> >>> URGENT -> Vi problems >>> From: >>> >>> LuisMi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Date: >>> >>> Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:03:16 +0100 (CET) >>> To: >>> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> I was editing a file called firewall2002.sh over my ssh connection >>> when the connection crash :-( >>> >>> I enter again into my computer and start again to finish my work. >>> >>> Now, when I try to execute that file I always read... >>> >>> ./firewall2002a.sh: line 1050: syntax error: unexpected end of file >>> >>> How can I resolve that? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> - -- +---------------------- >>> | Luis Miguel Cruz. >>> | | >>> Public Key: http://www.flcnet.es/tbe/luismi/nadie/luismi_adp.asc | >>> ----------------------+ >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) >>> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org >>> >>> iEYEARECAAYFAjxa9IYACgkQvQHLTzrFJlfg9wCeNmM5jg+sN557Ndskcvkgg7mH >>> tr8AnixQ3gUHbCHxpDnVsi4wI/g3yWZr >>> =OGaV >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Redhat-list mailing list >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >>> >>> Part 1.2 >>> >>> Content-Description: >>> >>> Today's Topics (19 msgs) >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> text/plain >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.2 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.3 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.4 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.5 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.6 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.7 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.8 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.9 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.10 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.11 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> Same here I can't find cfdisk command either. I tried to use it a >>> couple of days ago. >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.12 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.13 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.14 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.15 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.16 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.17 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3.18 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> message/rfc822 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.3 >>> >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> multipart/digest >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Part 1.4 >>> >>> Content-Description: >>> >>> Digest Footer >>> Content-Type: >>> >>> text/plain >>> >>> > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Redhat-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > Part 1.2 > > Content-Description: > > Today's Topics (13 msgs) > Content-Type: > > text/plain > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.3.2 > > Content-Type: > > message/rfc822 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.3.3 > > Content-Type: > > message/rfc822 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.3.4 > > Content-Type: > > message/rfc822 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.3.5 > > Content-Type: > > message/rfc822 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.3.6 > > Content-Type: > > message/rfc822 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.3.7 > > Content-Type: > > message/rfc822 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.3.8 > > Content-Type: > > message/rfc822 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.3.9 > > Content-Type: > > message/rfc822 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.3.10 > > Content-Type: > > message/rfc822 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.3.11 > > Content-Type: > > message/rfc822 > > Same here, I tried to locate cfdisk a couple of days ago to no avail. > I currently run a dual boot system. With windowsME on one > drive(hda1/vfat) and Linux on the other (hdb1/ext3), with Linux boot > information in the MBR of the windowME drive. I would now like make > the vfat partition smaller and create a ext3 partition on that drive. > Any suggestions. I was hoping I could do it with the cfdisk. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.3.12 > > Content-Type: > > message/rfc822 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.3.13 > > Content-Type: > > message/rfc822 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.3 > > Content-Type: > > multipart/digest > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.4 > > Content-Description: > > Digest Footer > Content-Type: > > text/plain > >
_______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
