Can you give us a detailed description of what your network looks like,
along with some network hardware descriptions?
-- Jonathan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Caskey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from internal windoze
machines to linux firewall (gateway)
> Hello...
>
> Well, except the internal network is the only slow section with
> smtp,pop3,ftp, etc From the outside world pop3, http, etc are fine?
>
> Still Puzzled
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jonathan M. Slivko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 4:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from internal windoze
> machines to linux firewall (gateway)
>
>
> > Could it have been a network issue on your ISP's side?
> > -- Jonathan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Greg Caskey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:15 PM
> > Subject: Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from internal windoze
> > machines to linux firewall (gateway)
> >
> >
> > > Puzzling Question....
> > >
> > > I have not had a chance to implement this fix to the caching DNS
server,
> > > however Now our connection speed is no longer slow. I can get email,
> > > telnet, etc at regular speed? I have not updated any changes on my
side
> > so
> > > I am wondering?
> > >
> > > Do you have anything that I can look at to see what is changing? DNS
> > route
> > > and Netstat -a runs fine, nslookup on my 10.0.0.1 is still not getting
> > > resolved as my ISP (of course) does not know about it but the network
> > > resolves quickly.
> > >
> > > Stumped?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Emmanuel Seyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 4:13 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from internal windoze
> > > machines to linux firewall (gateway)
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:48:54AM -0700, Greg Caskey wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. The 2nd NIC's IP address is 10.0.0.1 for the internal machines.
> > > Would my
> > > > > named.conf look like this:
> > > > >
> > > > > options {
> > > > > directory "/var/named";
> > > > > };
> > > >
> > > > Make it this:
> > > >
> > > > options {
> > > > directory "/var/named";
> > > > forwarders { ISP backup 1 IP; ISP backup 2 IP; };
> > > > forward only;
> > > > listen-on { 10.0.0.1; };
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > > Or should it be for 10.0.0.1 instead of 127.0.0.1?
> > > >
> > > > Nope. All DNS servers are masters for 127.0.0 since 127.0.0.1
> > > > always points to the local machine.
> > > >
> > > > > 2. The /etc/resolv.conf file should be as follows with my server
as
> > the
> > > > > caching server?
> > > >
> > > > Brillant.
> > > >
> > > > > Is there anything else I need to setup?
> > > >
> > > > You'll need the /var/named/named.local file specified in named.conf
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
