At 4/18/2002 05:48 PM -0400, Michael Fratoni wrote: >I use black hole lists here. I added a feature for each list I want to >use to sendmail.mc, like so: > >dnl Begin Blackhole lists >FEATURE(`dnsbl', `relays.ordb.org', `Rejected - see http://ordb.org/')dnl >FEATURE(dnsbl,`bl.spamcop.net', `Rejected - see: >http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?$&{client_addr}')dnl >FEATURE(dnsbl, `blackholes.mail-abuse.org', `Rejected - see >http://www.mail-abuse.org/rbl/')dnl >FEATURE(`delay_checks')dnl >dnl End Blackhole lists
May I ask why the first FEATURE has `dnsbl' in directed quotes, but the other two do not? >Some of the black hole lists are more extensive than others as well. Using >those lists is more likely to result in legitimate mail being bounced. Could you offer some suggestions as to how to determine which lists are *less* extensive, i.e. the most conservative in blocking? I'd like to keep false positives to the absolute minimum... Thanks! -- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
