-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hal Burgiss wrote:
>> http://distrowatch.colug.net/article-rpm.php >> > >Wow, along with his disclaimer about being biased, he should add he >has little knowledge of the subject matter. He overstates so many >things, it is more FUD than anything. I have my differences with the author's conclusions, to be sure. I'm not sure I'd place so much blame squarely on RPM's shoulders. I think it's fair to suggest that much of the difficulty discussed here is merely a symptom of the fragmentation of distributions. It's not RPM's fault that LSB is being widely disregarded, for instance, nor is it something for which RPM can reasonably be expected to compensate. - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPQzbpr9BpdPKTBGtEQKWFgCfaCBKzEz9yZFUcNMyIpEPbhbE5n8AoK55 3059BsXmtq6ogoMWcbLLMC+E =Ssl1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
