-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10-Jul-2002/22:52 -0400, Michael Fratoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wednesday 10 July 2002 10:30 pm, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
>> There is no point to adding sendmail to hosts.allow because it is not
>> called by inetd/xinetd. It is a standalone daemon that has its own
>> network access controls, just like Apache.
>>
>> SSHd is standalone too, but the Red Hat build is compiled with
>> tcpwrappers support, so it reads hosts.allow and hosts.deny without
>> having to depend on inetd/xinetd.
>
>Just like ssh Red Hat's sendmail is also built with tcp wrappers support.
[snip]

I stand corrected.


Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05    HomePage: <http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/>
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation <http://www.linux.org/>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x6C94239D

iD8DBQE9LPWFpCpg3WyUI50RAkQRAKCKe2AANa7pYNi47iLUlIIS7shXcQCgnVCg
HFiMvzhviNeBkyvHjzsDbTY=
=u3sX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to