On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 03:32:43PM -0400, Anthony Abby wrote:
: > Windows 2000 was indeed marketed to home users as the "more powerful, faster
: > OS". You're reaching, big time. :)
:
: Oh? How so? Windows NT was never marketed for home use. In fact
: literature on the MS website marketed it directly for business use.
: Windows 2000 was also never marketed for home use, and if you'll recall,
: at that time there were two parallel code bases.. Windows NT/Win2k and
: the Win 9.x codes bases.
You're right, NT 4.0 wasn't marketed for home use. 2000 was. It was
marketed as the "bigger, badder, more stable" alternative to home users.
There was a huge sign for it in my local compusa at the time.
--
Jason Costomiris <>< | Technologist, geek, human.
jcostom {at} jasons {dot} org | http://www.jasons.org/
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
My account, My opinions.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
