Hi List, Tony
I was able to use the first two network that you
gave (192.168.100.0, 192.168.100.64) and ping and used to communicate with other
win98/w2k client using netmeeting and I was so happy, I just have another
question because when I browse the network neighborhhod on win98/w2k I cant see
the other network (B) or vise versa, is this realy the scenario or do I have tho
configure something
TIA
Toto
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 8:29
AM
Subject: Re: Connecting two LAN
Thanks Tony
Were not using a DHCP. I just used the first two
network that you gave and try to change it again in the future if we expand
our network (hopefully). I'll keep a printed/soft copy of your email and post
again the development of this.
thanks again
Regards,
Toto
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:47
PM
Subject: Re: Connecting two LAN
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On
16-Oct-2002/15:43 +0800, Toto Gamez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: >We have two separate network in two different offices with
both Class C IP. > >Network A >IP from 192.168.100.1 to
50 >Dial-up (RH7.2 pppd/mgetty) server ppp0 IP
192.168.100.99 >Web/Email server with one public IP >win98/w2k
clients > >Network B >IP from 192.168.100.101 to
18 >Dial-in server (RH7.2 NAT/IP forwarding/internet sharing) ppp0
IP >192.168.100.100 w98/w2k clients > >Network B dial-in
server connect to Network A Dial-up server to retrieved >their e-mail
and browse the internet. What I want is, is there any way >that this
two network see each other (w98/w2k clients) to share resources >and
for support using using these two dial-in/up server. Someone
told >me that I can do that using static routing. I
tried > >Network B (dial-up server) ># route add -net
192.168.100.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.100.99 > >Network
A (dial-in server) ># route add -net 192.168.100.0 netmask
255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.100.100 > >I try to ping w98/w2k IP
from another w98/w2k but no luck
The networks are identical. They are
both 192.168.100.0/255.255.255.0, so you can't route between them. You
need to create separate networks. Working with your existing IP
addresses, you can do this by making these subnets:
Network
Netmask IP Range (incl
network & broadcast) ---------------
--------------- -----------------------------------
192.168.100.0 255.255.255.192 192.168.100.0 -
192.168.100.63 192.168.100.64 255.255.255.192
192.168.100.64 - 192.168.100.127
That works, but it limits your
ability to add machines at your biggest site. Assuming all the IPs you
listed are in use, this plan only has 12 unused IP addresses at the
larger site. If you are willing to change IP addresses at the smaller
site (you are using DHCP aren't you?), you can have 126 usable addresses
per site:
Network
Netmask IP Range (incl
network & broadcast) ---------------
--------------- -----------------------------------
192.168.100.0 255.255.255.128
192.168.100.0 - 192.168.100.127 192.168.100.128
255.255.255.128 192.168.100.128 - 192.168.100.255
If/when
new sites are added, you can give each new site a subnet with 126 usable
addresses:
Network
Netmask IP Range (incl
network & broadcast) ---------------
--------------- -----------------------------------
192.168.101.0 255.255.255.128
192.168.101.0 - 192.168.101.127 192.168.101.128
255.255.255.128 192.168.101.128 - 192.168.101.255
192.168.102.0 255.255.255.128
192.168.102.0 - 192.168.102.127 192.168.102.128
255.255.255.128 192.168.102.128 - 192.168.102.255
Tony -
-- Anthony E. Greene <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]%3E> OpenPGP
Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6C94
239D AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05 HomePage: <http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/> Linux.
The choice of a GNU generation <http://www.linux.org/>
-----BEGIN
PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Anthony
E. Greene <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
0x6C94239D
iD8DBQE9rW4BpCpg3WyUI50RAv/PAJ47j/4jPOJjbc0D7UYDiGz3T1AE6wCfQ744 dMKwD+egk+RIHb8WYJS0/JY= =61Ja -----END
PGP SIGNATURE-----
|