On Wednesday 10 May 2006 15:37, Alexander Viro wrote: > That's very odd. I can at least understand where spinlock crap might > appear, but nearly doubled amount of do_path_lookup()? That's the > case when no watches are set, right?
Right. No watches or syscall rules. -Steve -- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
