Steve Grubb wrote: > On Tuesday 30 May 2006 15:58, Paul Moore wrote: > >>>Are there other possible options like a boot param? >> >>Not presently but anything is possibile. > > > OK, this was a suggestion...there are probably a couple ways to solve the > problem. We need to try to keep the upgrade path smooth for people. On FC, > you cannot control which kernel and policy people choose to run with. On very > rare occassions we've done that but got a lot of upset people as a result. > So, I'd hesitate to go down this path where we know people's apps will break > when they upgrade the kernel. > > This problem needs to be fixed soon because no one can test the LSPP kernel > unless they are in permissive mode. I can probably build a lspp.32 kernel > with netlabel patch removed again if you think it will be a while. Just let > me know... >
It's not a problem of the change being difficult, it's a matter of what is the right thing to do? Tell me what you want and I'll code it up (this is in invitation for everyone else on the list to chime in too). -- paul moore linux security @ hp -- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
