> > The extra level of indirection provided by the flow makes things a > > bit harder to follow, so I think that this should be made clear in > > documentation somehow. I am not sure if people will be able to > > maintain this notion easily later. My understanding is below. > > It would be lot a easier if people looked at this in terms of "flow".
The "indirection" is necessary and the "flow" has always been there since we don't always have a socket (forward case again). We just needed to go with the flow :) -- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
