Quoting Daniel Lezcano ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > >>By the way, having the same IP address for several containers, how will be > >>possible to do container migration ? > > > > > >It depends on the circumstances. In general having several containers > >with the > >same IP address is a bad idea. But if you have a setup where you can > >do it safely there is nothing preventing that setup from working between > >machines, so it is neither a positive or a negative from a migration > >standpoint. > > What about the clients connected to the different containers ? For > example, you have 100 containers, all are configured with 192.168.1.100 > and have an application binded to INADDR_ANY:80.
Remember that the usage we're talking about here adds a new selector, the security label, which will uniquely identify each container. > In front of that, you have 100 clients. Each of them are connected to > the application running in each container. > One container is migrated to another machine on the network, it is not > possible to keep the same address, so the address is changed to Hmm, why? Note that the idea of checkpointing and migrating a LSPP certified system gets a little scary, and I'm not sure anyone would ever dare do that, but still I'm not clear on why this system couldn't keep it's address. > 192.168.1.200. The clients connected to 192.168.1.100 will lose the > communication. -serge -- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
