On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:32:43 EDT, Paul Moore said: > For clarification, you mention that the code "looks good enough for > -mm", are you basing that on the performance numbers only or have you > had a chance to look at the patches too?
The perf numbers, and a quick look-over the code. I'm suspecting if it's already gotten comments on the netdev list, I'm unlikely to find anything else major by looking it over (I never manage to find stuff doing a careful review, it's always "WTF, let's take a quick eyeball and see if anything pops out"). Another merge issue - has anybody managed to get this to "play nice" with the already-in-mm1 SECMARK code?
pgpAhRdy6UzQT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
