On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:23:50 BST, Tim Waugh said: > Small thing: should the daemon be called just 'access', or would > 'lspp-access' be better?
lspp-access, definitely. That way, if one of my not-so-LSPP-savvy co-workers encounters it, they won't mistake it for that other daemon that's running and providing accessibility functions for the disabled...
pgpLjYp0LvFQ6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
