James Morris wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Linda Knippers wrote: > > >>Dumb question....should compat_net be "1" by default? > > > Ideally, no, the new secmark controls were posted in May and everyone > should be using them. I only added the compat_net option to help > with transition, and it could disappear at any time.
Just seems like we're pretty early in the transition if updating the kernel requires a new policy to not suffer a major regression, but then I don't really understand all the secid reconciliation stuff. -- ljk -- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
