> > Non-kernel code issues which must be resolved/explained
> > 1) I also haven't heard any response to method's inquiry about the
> > meaning of some unlabeled_t denials namely
> >
> > audit(1159877238.937:35): avc: denied { polmatch } for
> > scontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0
> > tcontext=root:system_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c255 tclass=association
>
> The patch I posted last night should take care of this as well.
>
I misread the target in the above denial to be unlabeled_t. But I
see it's unconfined_t. Currently looking at Joshua's post in this regard.
--
redhat-lspp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
